Table 2 Bibliographic analysis of clinical outcome studies with x-stop insertion for spinal stenosis
Study | # of pts | Type ofsurgery | f-u time(months) | Mean outcomes improvementat last follow-up | Patient satisfaction domainof ZCQ (% of pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kondrashov et al (JSDT 2006) [14] | 18 | x-stop only | 51 | 29 (ODI) | not reported |
Shidiqui et al (Spine 2007) [22] | 24 | x-stop only | 12 | 11 (ODI) | 71 |
Zucherman et al (Spine 2005) [8] | 93 | x-stop only | 24 | 45.4% (ZCQ symptom severity domain) | 73.1 |
Brussee et al (Eur Spine J 2008) [23] | 65 | x-stop only | 12 | 48.4% (ZCQ walking ability) | 74.2 |
Kuchta et al (Eur Spine J 2009) [20] | 175 | x-stop only | 24 | 12 (ODI) | not reported |
Ploumis et al | 22 | x-stop plusdecompression | 27.4 | 30 (ODI) | 90.9 |