Biomechanical comparison of all-polyethylene total knee replacement and its metal-backed equivalent on periprosthetic tibia using the finite element method

Table 3 Simulations overview

Tibial Component	Designation based on groups	Material model		Model of geometry, mesh	Load and boundary conditions
Tibial Component	Designation based on groups	Cancellous bone tissue	Cortical bone tissue	Model of geometry, mesh	Load and boundary conditions
AP	G60	E + 5% from G65	Same for all models	Common to all groups and AP TKA	Same for all models
	G65	Based on representative patient
	G70	E − 5% from G65
	MIN	E − 21% from G65
MB	G60	E + 5% from G65		Common to all groups and MB TKA
	G65	Based on representative patient
	G70	E − 5% from G65
	MIN	E − 21% from G65

ISSN: 1749-799X