Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparative outcome measures at three months after the surgery in both groups

From: A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children

Outcome measure

Crossed medial-lateral pin entry group † (n = 64)

Two-lateral pin entry group *(n = 66)

p Value

Carrying angle (degree)Ï€

5.52 ± 3.77

5.56 ± 4.62

0.95ζ

Loss of Carrying angle (degree) π

3.58 ± 3.08

3.86 ± 3.33

0.62ζ

Passive range of elbow motion (degree) π

   

   Flexion

128.3 ± 12.67

127.96 ± 4.38

0.75 ζ

   Extension

-2.6 ± -0.13

-2.56 ± -0.16

0.12ζ

   Total range of motion

130.58 ± 3.9

129.39 ± 4.48

0.11ζ

Loss of total passive range of elbow motion (degree) π

3.4 ± 2.9

3.8 ± 3.21

0.45 ζ

Flynn grading (% of patients) ¶

  

0.84 ψ

   Excellent

51(80)

48(73)

 

   Good

6(9)

8(12)

 

   Fair

7(11)

10(15)

 

   Poor

0

0

 

Loss of reduction grading (% of patients) ¶

  

0.94 ψ

   Major

0

0

 

   Mild

9 (15)

8 (12)

 

   None

55 (85)

58 (88)

 

Baumann angle (degree) π

77.2 ± 4.35

76.2 ± 3.51

0.15 ζ

Change in the Baumann angle (degree) π

3.57 ± 2.43

3.71 ± 2.1

0.72 ζ

  1. † Data were missing for 16 patients * Data were missing for 14 patients
  2. π The datas are given as the mean ± standard deviation
  3. ¶ The datas are given as the number (%) of patients
  4. ζ Independent-sample student t test
  5. ψ Chi-square test