Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of truncated variants in GLI family zinc finger 3 (GLI3) associated with polydactyly

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 19, Article number: 449 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Polydactyly is a prevalent congenital anomaly with an incidence of 2.14 per 1000 live births in China. GLI family zinc finger 3 (GLI3) is a classical causative gene of polydactyly, and serves as a pivotal transcription factor in the hedgehog signaling pathway, regulating the development of the anterior-posterior axis in limbs.

Methods

Three pedigrees of polydactyly patients were enrolled from Hunan Province, China. Pathogenic variants were identified by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing.

Results

Three variants in GLI3 were identified in three unrelated families, including a novel deletion variant (c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44), a novel insertion-deletion (indel) variant (c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter), and a nonsense variant (c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter). These variants were present exclusively in patients but not in healthy individuals.

Conclusions

We identified three pathogenic GLI3 variants in polydactyly patients, broadening the genetic spectrum of GLI3 and contributing significantly to genetic counseling and diagnosis for polydactyly.

Background

Polydactyly is a common congenital limb anomaly, occurring in approximately 2.14 per 1000 live births in China [1]. Polydactyly includes syndromic polydactyly and isolated polydactyly (IPD). IPD is further classified into three categories: preaxial polydactyly, which involves a non-functional duplicated thumb on the hand or foot; postaxial polydactyly, featuring a fully or partially duplicated digit on the ulnar side of the hand or foot; and central polydactyly, a less common type involving anomalies of the index, middle, or ring fingers [2]. Surgical interventions, such as removal of supernumerary digits and redundant skeletal structures, are the primary treatments to maintain joint stability and soft tissue balance [3]. Various genes have been identified as contributing to IPD, including the GLI family zinc finger 3 (GLI3, OMIM 165,240), zinc finger protein 141 (ZNF141, OMIM 194,648), IQ domain-containing protein E (IQCE, OMIM 617,631), GLI family zinc finger 1 (GLI1, OMIM 165,220), Family with sequence similarity 92, member A (FAM92A, OMIM 617,273), KIAA0825 (OMIM 617,266), Dachshund family transcription factor 1 (DACH1, OMIM 603,803), Mirror-image polydactyly 1 (MIPOL1, OMIM 606,850), and Paired-like homeodomain 1 (PITX1, OMIM 602,149) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Notably, GLI1 and GLI3 are crucial for limb development, with GLI3 being a classical gene implicated in polydactyly [13].

The GLI3 gene, located on chromosome 7p14.1, encodes an 1580-amino acid protein that exists in two isoforms: the full-length activator (GLI3-A) and the truncated repressor (GLI3-R) [14]. The GLI3 protein plays a pivotal role in limb development by acting as a nuclear transducer and negative regulator of Soni Hedgehog (SHH) signaling, which establishes the zone of polarizing activity essential for the formation of the anterior-posterior limb axis [15, 16]. Loss-of-function variants in GLI3 can lead to various limb development disorders, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS; OMIM 175,700), preaxial polydactyly type A/B (PAPA/PAPB; OMIM 174,200), Pallister Hall syndrome (PHS; OMIM 146,510), postaxial polydactyly type A1 and B (OMIM 174,200) and preaxial polydactyly type III (OMIM 174,700) [17,18,19,20].

In this study, we recruited several families with polydactyly and identified three GLI3 variants, including a novel deletion variant (NM_000168.6: c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44), a novel insertion-deletion (indel) variant (NM_000168.6: c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter), and a previously reported nonsense variant (NM_000168.6: c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter). These findings broaden the genetic spectrum associated with GLI3 and enhance genetic counseling and diagnosis of polydactyly.

Methods

Ethical compliance

This study was approved (2,023,030,444) by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. We performed this study in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients/participants or their guardians provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Participants/patients

Three families (Family I-III) were investigated in this study. Peripheral blood samples were collected from probands and their family members. Clinical data were recorded carefully.

Whole-exome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Exome capture and whole-exome sequencing (WES) were conducted at Berry Genomics (Beijing, China). 1 µg DNA was captured using the SureSelect Human All Exon Kit V6 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., CA, USA) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq4000 platform (Illumina Inc., CA, USA). Briefly, the genomic DNA was randomly extracted using a Covaris S220 sonicator (Covaris, Inc., MA, USA). The fragmented DNA underwent three enzymatic steps: end repair, a-tailing, and adapter ligation. The adapter-ligated DNA fragments were amplified using Herculase II Fusion DNA Polymerase (Agilent). Finally, the exosomes in the pre-capture libraries were captured using the SureSelect capture library kit (Agilent). After DNA quality assessment, the captured DNA library was subjected to WES on the Illumina HiSeq4000 platform. Downstream processing was carried out using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), Varscan2, and Picard, and variant calls were made with the GATK Haplotype Caller 12. Variant annotation was performed according to Ensemble release 82, and filtering was conducted using ANNOVAR Documentation.

The filtering strategies conformed to those used in our previous study [21]. Variants with an alternative allele frequency > 0.001 in the 1000G database (http://www.1000genomes.org/) and the GnomAD database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) were used for further analysis. These filtered variants were predicted their pathogenicity using MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/), Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), SIFT (http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php), and CADD (https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/snv) [22]. Bone development related genes were used to filter candidate variants [23].

Co-segregation analysis

Co-segregation analysis was performed on each family member using Sanger sequencing. The primer pairs (GLI3-1-F: 5’-CCTCCTGTTGTGTCTGATTCTT-3’; GLI3-1-R: 5’-GGTTCCTGAATACCATCCACTT-3’; GLI3-2-F: 5’-GAGGCTCATGTCACCAAGAA-3’; GLI3-2-R: 5’-CTGTGAAGTCAGAAGGAGAGTG-3’; GLI3-3-F: 5’-CCAAATGGATGGAGCACGTA-3’; GLI3-3-R: 5’-CGGATGGTTACAGCGTCATT-3’) used for PCR amplification were designed using Primer 5. The sequences of the PCR products were determined using an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) [22].

Results

Clinical description

We conducted an investigation into three Chinese families (Family I-III) from Hunan Province of China (Table 1). Family I consists of six immediate members, four of whom have exhibited features of polydactyly or syndactyly (Fig. 1A). Radiography showed that the proband presented syndactyly of the fourth and fifth fingers on the right hand and polydactyly of thumbs on each foot (Fig. 1B). Additionally, his sister was affected by syndactyly on all limbs, and his mother had surgically corrected dysmorphic toes. The family reported a history of polydactyly in the deceased grandfather’s toes.

Table 1 Clinical details of patients in this study
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinic description of the probands with polydactyly related to GLI3. (A) Pedigree of Family I. (B) Clinical features of proband I. (C) Pedigree of Family II. (D) Clinical features of proband II before surgery. (E) Clinical features of proband II after surgery. (F) Pedigree of Family III. (G) Clinical features of proband III before surgery. (H) Clinical features of proband III after surgery. Squares = men; circles = women; black symbols = individuals with variants; Slashes = individuals who die; arrows = the probands

Full size image

Proband II from Family II was born with polydactyly affecting both hands and feet, with no similar conditions reported in the family’s history (Fig. 1C and D). Surgical removal of the extra fingers was performed at a different hospital when the patient was one year old, and subsequent toe resection occurred at our hospital, resulting in successful recover (Fig. 1E).

Proband III from Family III displayed heptadactyly on both feet, polydactyly on the first and fifth toes, and syndactyly between the first and second toes, with no reported familial history of these anomalies (Fig. 1F and G). The extra toes were surgically removed (Fig. 1H). Considering the clinical manifestations in Family I and III, we made primary diagnosis of mild GCPS, whereas the proband from Family II appeared to have IPD [13].

Genetic analysis

Using WES and Sanger sequencing, we identified three GLI3 variants in the probands from three families, including two novel variants (NM_000168.6: c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44 and c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter) and one known variant (NM_000168.6: c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter). According to the standards of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standards, these variants were designated as “pathogenic” (Table 2).

Table 2 Information and pathogenicity classification of GLI3 variants in this study
Full size table

In Family I, WES produced 9.7 Gb of data, achieving 98.1% coverage of the target region and over 10× coverage for 99.0% of the targets. After excluding common variants in the 1000G and GnomAD databases, and retaining variants predicted to be disease-causing using MutationTaster, Polyphen-2, SIFT and CADD, which were also positioned in genes associated with bone development, one GLI3 variant (c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44) was identified. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the heterozygous frameshift variant in GLI3 in Proband I (Fig. 2A). Adherence to ACMG guidelines, this variant was deemed “pathogenic”: it was a frameshift variant often leading to loss of function (PVS1), was absent in control cohorts from the 1000G and GnomAD databases (PM2) and co-segregated with the polydactyly phenotype in Family I (PP1). It was also predicted to have a deleterious effect on the gene product as determined by tools such as MutationTaster (PP3). Additionally, alignments of GLI3 amino acid sequences across various species showed high conservation in this region (p.458–466) (Fig. 2B), demonstrating the critical nature of this sequence.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Genetic description of the probands with polydactyly related to GLI3. (A, C, D) Sanger sequencing results of the GLI3 variant among the probands. (B) Alignment analysis of the region (p.458–466) in the GLI3 amino acid sequence showed that the region was highly conserved. (E) Localization of the variant in GLI3. Red region = frameshift variant; RD = repressor domain; SUFU = SUFU site; ZFN = zinc finger domain; CS = cleavage site, TAD = transactivation domain

Full size image

In Family II, we identified the heterozygous nonsense variant (c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter) in Proband II (Fig. 2C). According to the ACMG guidelines, this variant was classified as a nonsense variant (PVS1). It has not been observed in healthy population databases (PM2), and bioinformatic tools predict its deleterious effects (PP3). Consequently, it was designated as “pathogenic”.

In Family III, a heterozygous variant (c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter) was identified, which was a known truncation variant (Fig. 2D) [24]. Similarly, according to the ACMG guidelines (PVS1, PM2, PP3), this variant was considered “pathogenic”.

Discussion

GLI3 is a pivotal transcription factor in the SHH signaling pathway, comprising multiple domains: a repressor domain (RD), a suppressor of fusion (SUFU) site, a zinc finger domain (ZFN), a cleavage site (CS), a CREB-binding protein (CBP) domain, and two transactivation domains (TAD1 and TAD2). The ZFN domain facilitates GLI3’s DNA binding, enabling transcriptional suppression or activation of SHH target genes. Additionally, the CS domain allows GLI3 to be cleaved from GLI3-A to GLI3-R by the proteasome [25,26,27,28]. In this study, we identified three GLI3 variants (c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44, c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter, and c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter) in polydactyl y patients. The variant p.Thr458GlnfsTer44, located in the ZFN domain, disrupts transcriptional functions, while variants p.Ser656Ter and p.Arg792Ter, positioned in or adjoining the CS, directly influence the GLI3-A to GLI3-R conversion (Fig. 2E).

It has been suggested that the location of GLI3 variants significantly impacts the manifestation of digital anomalies due to the dual role of GLI3 as an activator or repressor in the SHH pathway [29]. In mouse model, GLI3 haploinsufficiency, often resulting from loss-of-function variants upstream of or within the ZFN domain, has been linked to the pathogenesis of GCPS, characterized by cranial enlargement and a wide interorbital distance [30]. In this study, the frameshift variant p.Thr458GlnfsTer44 in Family I introduces a premature stop codon, leading to a GLI3 protein lacking the essential ZFN domain for DNA binding, which may contribute to GCPS, corroborating earlier research findings. The CS domain is critical in regulating the ratio of GLI3-A/GLI3-R, thus, variants in the CS region can result in an excess of GLI3-R in limb buds and the neural tube, which predominantly drives the pathogenesis of PHS. PHS is associated with diverse anomalies including hypothalamic hamartoma, cleft larynx, imperforate anus, and pulmonary lobation anomalies [31]. This study also identified two truncation variants (p.Ser656Ter and p.Arg792Ter) within the CS domain, which may result in premature termination of GLI3, loss of GLI3-A function, and excessive production of GLI3-R (Fig. 2E). Notably, while the patient in Family II was diagnosed with IPD, and the patient in Family III with mild GCPS, neither presented craniofacial anomalies. Research by Sczakiel et al. indicated that GLI3 variants linked to IPD can also occur in the ZFN and CS domains, challenging previous beliefs that such variants are confined to the C-terminal TAD domain, aligning whit our findings in Family II [32].

A previous study proposed that GLI3 expression could demarcate between posterior and anterior hand anomalies. Specifically, GLI3 haploinsufficiency has been linked to the etiology of preaxial polydactyly, whereas postaxial polydactyly arises from abnormal truncations in the TAD [33]. In this study, Proband I, exhibited preaxial polydactyly traits, carried a truncating variant upstream of the ZFN in GLI3, likely leading to GLI3 haploinsufficiency. Conversely, Proband II, who displayed postaxial polydactyly, harbored a truncating variant in the CS domain of GLI3, potentially resulting in TAD functional deficiency. These observations align with findings from Bass et al. However, despite the variant in Proband III being associated with a TAD deficiency, the phenotype included both preaxial and postaxial polydactyly, highlighting gaps in current understanding of the relationship between GLI3 variant locations and clinical manifestations. Future research is warranted to elucidate this association more comprehensively.

To investigate the genotype-phenotype correlation further, we analyzed 246 cases of polydactyly linked to GLI3 variants (Fig. 3A). A predilection for variants in the C-terminal region of GLI3 was noted. Statistical analyses confirmed that the majority of polydactyly cases resulted from by loss-of-function GLI3 variants (Fig. 3B), with 144 cases (approximately 59%) associated with GCPS (Fig. 3C), corroborating previous studies [13]. In this study, both Family I and III demonstrated features of GCPS. Furthermore, prior research estimated the incidence of IPD at 1.01 per 1000 live births [34], and our analysis revealed that a only 13% of IPD cases involved truncating GLI3 variants (Fig. 3D). In this study, all patients exhibited GLI3 truncations, yet the patients in Family II was diagnosed with IPD, whereas patients in Family I and III showed milder forms of GCPS, primarily affecting hands or feet. These findings suggest a tendency for milder phenotypic manifestations among GLI3 truncation carriers in Hunan Province. Remarkably, a further statistical assessment of all IPD patients confirmed that loss-of-function GLI3 variants are also a predominant pathogenic factor (Fig. 3E).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of polydactyly related to GLI3 reported in other studies. (A) Variants of the GLI3 protein have been reported. (B) Types of GLI3 variants involved in polydactyly. (C) Polydactyly types caused by GLI3 variants. (D) Polydactyly types caused by GLI3 truncation variants. (E) Types of GLI3 variants involved in isolated polydactyly. RD = repressor domain; SUFU = SUFU site; ZFN = zinc finger domain; CS = cleavage site; CBD = CREB-binding protein (CBP) domain; TAD = transactivation domain; TA1 = transactivation domain 1; TA2 = transactivation domain 2

Full size image

In this study, surgical procedures were performed on patients affected by polydactyly to remove the supernumerary fingers. This process may result in damage to the muscles and bones in the affected areas, impacting the patients’ daily lives during the recovery period. Recent studies have identified multiple genes associated with susceptibility to skeletal muscle injury and repair capacity [35,36,37,38,39,40], and significant differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of these genes have been observed among populations with different levels of physical activity [41, 42]. These findings suggest that analyzing specific SNPs of susceptibility genes in patients could be beneficial in predicting their postoperative recovery capacity. For patients with high muscle susceptibility and low repair capacity, it may be advisable to consider therapeutic measures that promote muscle repair during surgery. For example, based on the ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to differentiate into various mesenchymal tissues, applying MSCs to the injury site may significantly improve the biomechanical properties, structure, and function of the muscle postoperatively [43].

Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified a novel frameshift variant (c.1372del, p.Thr458GlnfsTer44), a novel indel variant (c.1967_1968delinsAA, p.Ser656Ter) and a previously reported nonsense variant (c.2374 C > T, p.Arg792Ter) associated with polydactyly. This study not only elucidates potential mechanisms underlying GLI3-mediated polydactyly syndromes and broadens the variant spectrum of the GLI3 gene, but also explores the correlation between genotype and phenotype.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CBP:

CREB-Binding Protein domain

CS:

Cleavage Site

GCPS:

Greig CephaloPolysyndactyly Syndrome

GLI3:

GLI family zinc finger 3

GLI1:

GLI family zinc finger 1

ZNF141:

Zinc finger protein 141

IQCE:

IQ domain-Containing Protein E

FAM92A:

Family with sequence similarity 92, Member A

DACH1:

Dachshund family transcription factor 1

MIPOL1:

Mirror-Image polydactyly 1

PITX1:

Paired-Like homeodomain 1

IPD:

Isolated PolyDactyly

PHS:

Pallister-hall syndrome

RD:

Repressor domain

SHH:

Sonic Hedgehog

SUFU:

Suppressor of Fused site

TAD:

Transactivation domain

WES:

Whole-Exome Sequencing

ZFN:

Zinc Finger domain

indel:

insertion-deletion

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

References

  1. Zhang N, Zhong WY, Tian W. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of polydactyly. J Clin Orthop Res. 2023;08(01):63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad Z, Liaqat R, Palander O, Bilal M, Zeb S, Ahmad F, et al. Genetic overview of postaxial polydactyly: updated classification. Clin Genet. 2023;103(1):3–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly DM, Mahmoud K, Mauck BM. Polydactyly of the foot: a review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(9):361–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen X, Yuan L, Xu H, Hu P, Yang Y, Guo Y, et al. Novel GLI3 mutations in Chinese patients with non-syndromic post-axial Polydactyly. Curr Mol Med. 2019;19(3):228–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalsoom Ue, Klopocki E, Wasif N, Tariq M, Khan S, Hecht J, et al. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel zinc-finger gene ZNF141 associated with autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly type A. J Med Genet. 2013;50(1):47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palencia-Campos A, Martínez-Fernández ML, Altunoglu U, Soto-Bielicka P, Torres A, Marín P, et al. Heterozygous pathogenic variants in GLI1 are a common finding in isolated postaxial polydactyly A/B. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(1):265–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schrauwen I, Giese AP, Aziz A, Lafont DT, Chakchouk I, Santos-Cortez RLP, et al. FAM92A underlies nonsyndromic Postaxial Polydactyly in humans and an abnormal limb and digit skeletal phenotype in mice. J Bone Min Res. 2019;34(2):375–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ullah I, Kakar N, Schrauwen I, Hussain S, Chakchouk I, Liaqat K, et al. Variants in KIAA0825 underlie autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly. Hum Genet. 2019;138(6):593–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Umair M, Shah K, Alhaddad B, Haack TB, Graf E, Strom TM, et al. Exome sequencing revealed a splice site variant in the IQCE gene underlying post-axial polydactyly type A restricted to lower limb. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(8):960–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Umair M, Palander O, Bilal M, Almuzzaini B, Alam Q, Ahmad F, et al. Biallelic variant in DACH1, encoding Dachshund Homolog 1, defines a novel candidate locus for recessive postaxial polydactyly type A. Genomics. 2021;113(4):2495–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondoh S, Sugawara H, Harada N, Matsumoto N, Ohashi H, Sato M, et al. A novel gene is disrupted at a 14q13 breakpoint of t(2;14) in a patient with mirror-image polydactyly of hands and feet. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(3):136–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klopocki E, Kähler C, Foulds N, Shah H, Joseph B, Vogel H, et al. Deletions in PITX1 cause a spectrum of lower-limb malformations including mirror-image polydactyly. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(6):705–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Biesecker LG. The Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tempé D, Casas M, Karaz S, Blanchet-Tournier MF, Concordet JP. Multisite protein kinase A and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta phosphorylation leads to Gli3 ubiquitination by SCFbetaTrCP. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(11):4316–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Marigo V, Johnson RL, Vortkamp A, Tabin CJ. Sonic hedgehog differentially regulates expression of GLI and GLI3 during limb development. Dev Biol. 1996;180(1):273–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell. 1993;75(7):1401–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdullah YM, Azeem Z, Bilal M, Liaqat K, Hussain S, et al. Variants in GLI3 cause Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly Syndrome. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2019;23(10):744–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Qattan MM. A novel frameshift mutation of the GLI3 gene in a family with broad thumbs with/without big toes, postaxial polydactyly and variable syndactyly of the hands/feet. Clin Genet. 2012;82(5):502–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kariminejad A, Ghaderi-Sohi S, Keshavarz E, Hashemi SA, Parsimehr E, Szenker-Ravi E, et al. A GLI3 variant leading to polydactyly in heterozygotes and Pallister-Hall-Like syndrome in a homozygote. Clin Genet. 2020;97(6):915–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Radhakrishna U, Bornholdt D, Scott HS, Patel UC, Rossier C, Engel H, et al. The phenotypic spectrum of GLI3 morphopathies includes autosomal dominant preaxial polydactyly type-IV and postaxial polydactyly type-A/B; no phenotype prediction from the position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65(3):645–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dong Y, Du R, Fan LL, Jin JY, Huang H, Chen YQ, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies a novel TRPM4 mutation in a Chinese family with atrioventricular block. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:9247541.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang CY, Chen YQ, Jin JY, Du R, Fan LL, Xiang R. A novel nonsense mutation of ABCA8 in a Han-Chinese Family with ASCVD leads to the reduction of HDL-c levels. Front Genet. 2020;11:755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo BB, Jin JY, Yuan ZZ, Zeng L, Xiang R. A novel COMP mutated allele identified in a Chinese family with Pseudoachondroplasia. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6678531.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel R, Singh CB, Bhattacharya V, Singh SK, Ali A. GLI3 mutations in syndromic and non-syndromic polydactyly in two Indian families. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2016;56(2):94–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai P, Akimaru H, Tanaka Y, Maekawa T, Nakafuku M, Ishii S. Sonic hedgehog-induced activation of the Gli1 promoter is mediated by GLI3. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(12):8143–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalff-Suske M, Wild A, Topp J, Wessling M, Jacobsen EM, Bornholdt D, et al. Point mutations throughout the GLI3 gene cause Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(9):1769–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsanev R, Tiigimägi P, Michelson P, Metsis M, Østerlund T, Kogerman P. Identification of the gene transcription repressor domain of Gli3. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(1):224–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Hao X, Jia X, Ji W, Yuan S, Gnamey EJA, et al. A novel variant of GLI3, p.Asp1514Thrfs*5, is identified in a Chinese family affected by polydactyly. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2022;10(7):e1968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Letelier J, Naranjo S, Sospedra-Arrufat I, Martinez-Morales JR, Lopez-Rios J, Shubin N et al. The Shh/Gli3 gene regulatory network precedes the origin of paired fins and reveals the deep homology between distal fins and digits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2021;118(46). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34750251.

  30. Veistinen L, Takatalo M, Tanimoto Y, Kesper DA, Vortkamp A, Rice DPC. Loss-of-function of Gli3 in mice causes abnormal frontal bone morphology and premature synostosis of the Interfrontal suture. Front Physiol. 2012;3:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. AlKattan WM, Al-Qattan MM, Bafaqeeh SA. The pathogenesis of the clinical features of oral-facial-digital syndrome type I. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(11):1277–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sczakiel HL, Hülsemann W, Holtgrewe M, Abad-Perez AT, Elsner J, Schwartzmann S, et al. GLI3 variants causing isolated polysyndactyly are not restricted to the protein’s C-terminal third. Clin Genet. 2021;100(6):758–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baas M, Burger EB, van den Ouweland AM, Hovius SE, de Klein A, van Nieuwenhoven CA, et al. Variant type and position predict two distinct limb phenotypes in patients with GLI3-mediated polydactyly syndromes. J Med Genet. 2021;58(6):362–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deng H, Tan T, Yuan L. Advances in the molecular genetics of non-syndromic polydactyly. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2015;17:e18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maffulli N, Margiotti K, Longo UG, Loppini M, Fazio VM, Denaro V. The genetics of sports injuries and athletic performance. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):173–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Artells R, Pruna R, Dellal A, Maffulli N. Elastin: a possible genetic biomarker for more severe ligament injuries in elite soccer. A pilot study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(2):188–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Longo UG, Loppini M, Margiotti K, Salvatore G, Berton A, Khan WS, et al. Unravelling the genetic susceptibility to develop ligament and tendon injuries. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;10(1):56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kambouris M, Ntalouka F, Ziogas G, Maffulli N. Predictive genomics DNA profiling for athletic performance. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2012;6(3):229–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pruna R, Artells R, Lundblad M, Maffulli N. Genetic biomarkers in non-contact muscle injuries in elite soccer players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(10):3311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kambouris M, Del Buono A, Maffulli N. Genomics DNA profiling in elite professional soccer players: a pilot study. Transl Med UniSa. 2014;9:18–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pruna R, Artells R, Ribas J, Montoro B, Cos F, Muñoz C, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with non-contact soft tissue injuries in elite professional soccer players: influence on degree of injury and recovery time. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Clos E, Pruna R, Lundblad M, Artells R, Maffulli N. ACTN3’s R577X single nucleotide polymorphism allele distribution differs significantly in Professional Football players according to their field position. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Aicale R, Tarantino D, Maccauro G, Peretti GM, Maffulli N. Genetics in orthopaedic practice. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents [Internet]. 2019;33(2 Suppl. 1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31169010.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patient advisers for their assistance in the clinical examination and blood specimen collection and the patient and his family members for their participation in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82170598, 81902274, and 82102527], Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province [grant number 2022sk2034], Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [grant number 2022JJ30058 and 2023JJ30967], Youth Science Foundation of Xiangya Hospital [grant number 2022Q10], and the Research Innovation Program of Central South University [grant number 2023ZZTS0945].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Run-Yan Wang and Qin Xiong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China

    Run-Yan Wang, Qin Xiong, Jie-Yuan Jin, Rong Xiang, Lei Zeng & Fang Yu

  2. School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China

    Run-Yan Wang, Si-Hua Chang & Rong Xiang

  3. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China

    Run-Yan Wang, Qin Xiong, Jie-Yuan Jin, Rong Xiang, Lei Zeng & Fang Yu

  4. Microsurgery & Reconstruction Research Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China

    Lei Zeng & Fang Yu

Authors
  1. Run-Yan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qin Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Si-Hua Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jie-Yuan Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rong Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RY.W. and Q.X. were responsible for Investigation, Visualization, Writing-original draft. SH.C. was responsible for Investigation. JY.J. was responsible for Methodology, Data curation. R.X. was responsible for Funding acquisition, Resources and Software, Supervision, Writing-review & editing. F.Y. was responsible for Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources and Software, Supervision, Writing-review & editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lei Zeng or Fang Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved (2023030444) by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. We performed this study in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients/participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, RY., Xiong, Q., Chang, SH. et al. Identification of truncated variants in GLI family zinc finger 3 (GLI3) associated with polydactyly. J Orthop Surg Res 19, 449 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04928-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04928-0

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X