Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between PLR and preoperative DVT investigated by total adjusted multivariate logistic regression model

From: Combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio with plasma D-dimer level to improve the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following ankle fracture

Variables

OR and 95% CI

P

PLR

2.84 (1.80ā€“4.47)

ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Age

1.04 (1.02ā€“1.05)

ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Gender (male vs female)

2.12 (1.21ā€“3.76)

0.027

Obesity (BMIā€‰ā‰„ā€‰28.0Ā kg/m2)

1.23 (0.62ā€“2.45)

0.558

Smoking

0.76 (0.42ā€“1.41)

0.387

Alcohol drinking

1.30 (0.73ā€“2.32)

0.380

Time from fracture to DUS examination

1.15 (1.08ā€“1.22)

ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Fracture type

Ā Ā 

Ā Unimalleolar

Reference

Ā 

Ā Bimalleolar

0.83 (0.45ā€“1.53)

0.551

Ā Trimalleolar

0.83 (0.47ā€“1.49)

0.538

Dislocation/subluxation

1.33 (0.76ā€“2.33)

0.316

Mechanism (high- versus low-energy)

1.38 (0.84ā€“2.26)

0.202

Hypertension

1.37 (0.72ā€“2.60)

0.342

Diabetes mellitus

1.43 (0.78ā€“2.63)

0.247

Cerebrovascular disease

0.87 (0.16ā€“4.84)

0.872

Heart disease

1.29 (0.41ā€“8.84)

0.088

Liver disease

2.01 (0.61ā€“6.59)

0.251

D-dimer (>ā€‰0.80Ā mg/L)

2.91 (1.79ā€“4.76)

ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

  1. PLRā€”platelet to lymphocyte rate, BMIā€”body mass index, ORā€”odd ratio, CIā€”confidence interval