Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical comparisons between the two groups

From: Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of Kümmell's disease: a retrospective cohort study

 

PKP (n = 122)

PMCP (n = 134)

t (Z)

p

VAS

    

 Preoperative

6(6–7)

6(5–7)

Z =  − 0.319

0.750

 Postoperative

2(2–3)*

2(2–2)*

Z =  − 3.123

0.002

 1 year Postoperative

2(2–2)*

2(2–2)*

Z =  − 2.630

0.009

ODI

    

 Preoperative

68.75 ± 6.64

67.70 ± 6.50

t =  − 1.282

0.201

 Postoperative

23.25 ± 3.50*

22.24 ± 3.55*

t =  − 2.281

0.023

 1 year Postoperative

19.64 ± 3.54*

18.58 ± 3.60*

t =  − 2.363

0.019

SF-36 bp

    

 Preoperative

22(14.25–28.38)

21(15–22)

Z =  − 1.059

0.290

 Postoperative

84(84–84)*

84(84–84)*

Z =  − 1.274

0.203

 1 year Postoperative

84(84–84)*

84(84–84)*

Z =  − 0.421

0.674

SF-36rp

    

 Preoperative

25(25–25)

25(25–25)

Z =  − 0.008

0.993

 Postoperative

75(75–75)*

75(75–75)*

Z =  − 0.554

0.580

 1 year Postoperative

75(75–75)*

75(75–100)*

Z =  − 0.639

0.523

  1. *Repeated measures variance analysis was used for the statistical analysis. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the postoperative or 1 year postoperative and preoperative values of these 2 groups
  2. PKP percutaneous kyphoplasty; PMCP percutaneous mesh-container-plasty; VAS visual pain analog scale; ODI Oswestry disability index; SF-36 rp short-form 36 health survey domains role physical; SF-36 bp short-form 36 health survey domains bodily pain