Comparing dislocation rates by approach following elective primary dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Butler, Justin T.; Stegelmann, Samuel D.; Butler, Johnathon L.; Bullock, Matthew; M. Miller, Richard

doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03724-6

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Table 3 Hip dislocations by intervention type

From: Comparing dislocation rates by approach following elective primary dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Author	References	Approach	Follow-Up (months)	Dislocation
Anterolateral
Chughtai et al.	[41]	ALA	36	0 (0.0)
Fessy et al.^†	[50]	ALA	104.4	0 (0.0)
Lamo-Espinosa et al.	[64]	ALA	49.0	0 (0.0)
Vielpeau et al.	[87]	ALA	151.1	5 (0.9)
Direct Anterior
Baker et al.	[32]	DAA	81.2	0 (0.0)
Batailler et al.^†	[33]	DAA	14	0 (0.0)
Homma et al.	[61]	DAA	15.7	0 (0.0)
Randelli et al.	[80]	DAA	23.6	0 (0.0)
Singh et al. ^†	[84]	DAA	≥ 12	1 (1.8)
Direct Lateral
Henawy and Badie	[59]	DLA	≥ 12	0 (0.0)
Posterior
Acker et al.	[29]	PLA	67.2	0 (0.0)
Almeida	[30]	PLA	24–74	0 (0.0)
Asselineau et al.	[31]	PLA	57	2 (0.6)
Assi et al.	[2]	PLA	59.9	0 (0.0)
Batailler et al.^†	[33]	PLA	14	0 (0.0)
Bauchu et al.	[34]	PLA	74.4	0 (0.0)
Beckert et al.	[35]	PLA	49	0 (0.0)
Belgaïd et al.	[36]	PLA	96	0 (0.0)
Bouchet et al.	[37]1	PLA	28	0 (0.0)
Chalmers et al.	[38]	PLA	24	0 (0.0)
Chalmers et al.	[39]	PLA	36	0 (0.0)
Dagneaux et al.	[42]	PLA	6	12 (1.1)
Dubin et al.	[44]	PLA	68.4	0 (0.0)
Dubin et al.	[45]	PLA	25.4	0 (0.0)
Dubin et al.	[46]	PLA	34.8	0 (0.0)
Epinette et al.	[47]	PLA	48	0 (0.0)
Epinette et al.	[48]	PLA	79.2	1 (3.2)
Fessy et al.^†	[50]	PLA	104.4	0 (0.0)
Fiquet and Noyer	[51]	PLA	< 36	1 (0.2)
Fresard et al.	[53]	PLA	64.8	0 (0.0)
Gaillard et al.	[54]	PLA	152.4	0 (0.0)
Gkiatas et al.	[55]	PLA	93.6	0 (0.0)
Haen et al.	[56]	PLA	50.4	0 (0.0)
Hamadouche et al.	[57]	PLA	72	3 (1.9)
Haughom et al.	[58]	PLA	≥ 1.5	0 (0.0)
Hernigou et al.	[60]	PLA	216	4 (4.7)
Jorgensen et al.	[62]	PLA	72	1 (1.7)
Kumar et al.	[63]	PLA	12*	0 (0.0)
Laurendon et al.	[65]	PLA	120	0 (0.0)
Londhe et al.	[66]	PLA	67.5	0 (0.0)
Luthra et al.	[67]	PLA	60	0 (0.0)
Maisongrosse et al. ^‡	[68]	PLA	54	0 (0.0)
Massin et al.	[70]	PLA	92.4	11 (0.4)
Moon et al.	[71]	PLA	37.2	0 (0.0)
Nam et al.	[72]	PLA	24	0 (0.0)
Neri et al.	[73]	PLA	303.6	0 (0.0)
Paderni et al.	[75]	PLA	27	0 (0.0)
Pattyn et al.	[76]	PLA	43.2	2 (2.9)
Philippot et al.	[77]	PLA	120	0 (0.0)
Prudhon et al.	[78]	PLA	163.3	3 (0.7)
Rowan et al.	[81]	PLA	40	0 (0.0)
Sanders et al.	[82]	PLA	38.2	0 (0.0)
Schneider et al.	[83]	PLA	34.1	0 (0.0)
Singh et al. ^†	[84]	PLA	≥ 12	3 (0.7)
Vermersch et al.	[86]	PLA	72	0 (0.0)
Vigdorchik et al.	[88]	PLA	36	0 (0.0)
Viricel et al.	[89]	PLA	117.6	0 (0.0)
Yang et al.	[90]	PLA	61.2	0 (0.0)
Combined
Boyer et al.	[10]	PLA DLA	264*	0 (0.0)
Chouteau et al.	[40]	PLA ALA	100.8	0 (0.0)
Dhawan et al.	[43]	PLA DAA	14	0 (0.0)
Ferreira et al.	[49]	PLA DLA	≥ 36	0 (0.0)
Foissey et al.	[52]	DAA PLA	70	0 (0.0)
Martz et al.	[69]	PLA DLA	116.8	0 (0.0)
Nessler et al.	[74]	PLA DLA DAA	32.2	0 (0.0)
Puch et al. ^‡	[79]	PLA DLA	132	0 (0.0)

Dislocation is reported as n (%)
*Median is reported instead of mean
^†Multi-armed study including ≥ 2 approaches
^‡Single extractable cohort from a study
ALA—Anterolateral approach, DAA—Direct anterior approach, DLA—Direct lateral approach, PLA—posterolateral approach

Back to article page

ISSN: 1749-799X

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com