Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of perioperative and follow-up parameters in all cases

From: How to make a more optimal surgical plan for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a comparative study based on the changes of the sagittal alignment and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra

 

Preoperative

Postoperative

P-pre and post

Follow-up

P-pre and follow-up

P-post and follow-up

Major TL/L curve (°)

45.0 ± 13.7

14.1 ± 10.5

 < 0.001*

15.6 ± 10.2

 < 0.001*

0.190

CL (°)

4.0 ± 12.3

3.9 ± 10.2

0.607

0.9 ± 15.4

0.143

0.043*

PrTK (°)

7.4 ± 7.1

11.0 ± 7.7

0.001*

8.0 ± 8.7

0.890

0.031*

TK (°)

22.5 ± 15.6

24.8 ± 10.9

0.199

28.2 ± 16.7

0.003*

0.160

LL (°)

 − 51.4 ± 12.2

 − 50.6 ± 12.5

0.621

 − 51.3 ± 20.9

0.212

0.991

PI (°)

48.3 ± 12.4

46.8 ± 15.2

0.246

45.9 ± 19.4

0.871

0.517

PT (°)

9.2 ± 7.7

7.9 ± 9.5

0.239

9.5 ± 11.2

0.887

0.341

SS (°)

39.2 ± 8.5

43.1 ± 27.4

0.307

36.6 ± 14.7

0.532

0.108

PJA (°)

7.6 ± 5.6

6.6 ± 9.5

0.391

8.1 ± 10.1

0.486

0.045*

T1 slope (°)

14.0 ± 8.7

17.1 ± 8.7

0.138

16.1 ± 9.7

0.252

0.986

  1. Values indicate mean ± standard deviation
  2. *Significant difference
  3. PI indicates pelvic incidence; PT pelvic tilt; SS sacral slope; LL lumbar lordosis; PrTK proximal thoracic kyphosis; TK thoracic kyphosis; CL cervical lordosis; pre preoperative; post postoperative; TL/L thoracolumbar/lumbar