Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical outcomes of the included studies

From: Bifocal versus trifocal bone transport for the management of tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection: a meta-analysis

Reference

Treatment technique

Number of patients

Infection nonunion

(%)

DS

(cm)

EFT

(day)

EFI

(day/cm)

Bone result

(ASAMI,

excellent and good)

Function result

(ASAMI,

excellent and good)

Complication

(per patient)

ABG (%)

Bone union rate(%)

Abulaiti et al

BFT

32

10(31.2%)

7.8 ± 1.8

474.5 ± 103.2

60.8 ± 1.9

28

26

0.96(31/32)

4(12.5%)

32(100%)

 

TFT

21

7(33.3%)

9.4 ± 1.5

328.0 ± 57.2

34.8 ± 2.1

19

18

0.52(11/21)

1(4.7%)

21(100%)

Catagni et al

BFT

45

16(35.5%)

12.5 ± 2.4

345.0 ± 54.1

27.6 ± 1.3

41

35

0.64(29/45)

16(35.5%)

45(100%)

 

TFT

41

22(53.6%)

13.5 ± 2.5

261.0 ± 45.7

19.3 ± 1.1

38

33

0.46(21/45)

11(26.8%)

41(100%)

Li et al

BFT

13

13(100%)

7.2 ± 0.8

541.8 ± 44.7

75.7 ± 7.8

9

10

0.23(3/13)

4(30.7%)

13(100%)

 

TFT

13

13(100%)

10.6 ± 2.3

381.3 ± 57.6

36.6 ± 6.0

11

12

0.3(4/13)

2(15.3%)

13(100%)

Liu et al

BFT

221

32(14.4%)

5.8 ± 1.6

385.1 ± 89.0

66.5 ± 8.5

182

106

0.3(68/221)

29(13.1%)

221(100%)

 

TFT

61

9(14.7%)

9.1 ± 1.7

340.6 ± 52.1

38.0 ± 6.5

51

30

0.37(23/61)

9(14.7%)

61(100%)

Yushan et al

BFT

21

21(100%)

7.6 ± 2.3

299.9 ± 128.2

62.2 ± 24.6

19

17

0.8(17/21)

1(4.7%)

21(100%)

 

TFT

16

16(100%)

10.3 ± 3.4

207.0 ± 40.4

32.9 ± 9.2

13

15

0.81(13/16)

1(6.2%)

16(100%)

  1. ABG, autologous bone grafting; ASAMI, Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov; BFT, bifocal bone transport; DS, defect size; EFI, external fixation index; EFT, external fixation time; nr, not reported; TFT, trifocal bone transport