Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of demographical parameters

From: Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial

 

VIT

Control

p-Value

Cases

 ITT

20 (51%)

19 (49%)

–

 AT

17 (44%)

22 (56%)

 

AO/OTA classification

 BITT

6 (30%)

7 (37%)

0.7411

 CITT

14 (70%)

12 (63%)

 

 BAT

5 (29%)

8 (36%)

0.7401

 CAT

12 (71%)

14 (64%)

 

Age mean (SD)

51.2 (17.1)

53.2 (15.8)

0.7072

Sex

 Male

11 (55%)

9 (47%)

0.7521

 Female

9 (45%)

10 (53%)

 

Academic

 Yes

3 (15%)

2 (10%)

0.8153

 No

15 (75%)

14 (74%)

 

 Unknown

2 (10%)

3 (16%)

 

Comorbidities

9 (45%)

12 (63%)

0.3411

Smoker

3 (15%)

7 (37%)

0.1181

Side

 Right

9 (45%)

9 (47%)

 > 0.9991

 Left

11 (55%)

10 (53%)

 
  1. Values are presented in mentions with (percentage), if not stated otherwise
  2. ITT Intention-to-treat, AT as treated
  3. 1Fisher ‘s exact test
  4. 2Student's t test for independent samples with Welch's correction
  5. 3Chi-square test
Back to article page

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X