Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of potential biomarkers of three group by serum GC/LC–MS analysis

From: A metabonomic study to explore potential markers of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and acute gouty arthritis

Metabolites

Changes in HUA (vs HCG)

Changes in AGA (vs HCG)

Changes in AGA (vs HUA)

Data origin

Status

VIP value

p§

Status

VIP value

p§

Status

VIP value

p§

Glutathione

1.21

< 0.001

1.16

< 0.001

1.09

 < 0.001

GC–MS

Malate

1.06

< 0.001

1.18

< 0.001

 

GC–MS

Phosphoethanolamine

1.28

< 0.001

1.33

< 0.001

1.35

0.029

GC–MS

Piceatannol

1.14

< 0.001

1.19

< 0.001

1.10

0.001

GC–MS

Saccharopine

1.80

< 0.001

1.60

< 0.001

2.15

0.010

GC–MS

Thymine

1.11

< 0.001

1.01

 < 0.001

1.62

 < 0.001

GC–MS

11-Dehydro-TXB3

1.50

< 0.001

1.43

 < 0.001

1.26

 < 0.001

LC–MS

Anandamide

3.61

< 0.001

3.70

< 0.001

LC–MS

Androsterone sulfate

1.68

< 0.001

1.72

< 0.001

LC–MS

DHEA sulfate

2.23

 < 0.001

1.98

< 0.001

LC–MS

Kynurenic acid

1.64

< 0.001

1.27

< 0.001

2.17

0.015

LC–MS

LysoPC

2.22

< 0.001

1.87

< 0.001

5.50

0.002

LC–MS

PA

1.18

< 0.001

1.22

< 0.001

 

LC–MS

Pantothenic acid

2.59

< 0.001

2.61

< 0.001

1.10

0.014

LC–MS

PC

2.91

< 0.001

2.68

< 0.001

4.6.3

 < 0.001

LC–MS

PGE2

6.19

< 0.001

6.35

< 0.001

LC–MS

PGF2α

2.36

< 0.001

2.43

< 0.001

LC–MS

PI

1.28

< 0.001

1.31

< 0.001

LC–MS

Pregnane

1.29

< 0.001

1.32

< 0.001

LC–MS

Prostaglandin

1.62

< 0.001

1.64

< 0.001

LC–MS

PS

1.90

< 0.001

1.80

< 0.001

LC–MS

SM

1.22

< 0.001

1.30

< 0.001

1.01

 < 0.001

LC–MS

Stearic acid

9.56

< 0.001

9.81

< 0.001

LC–MS

  1. HUA: asymptomatic hyperuricemia; AGA: acute gouty arthritis; LysoPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; PA: phosphatidic acid; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PGE2: Dinoprostone; PGF2α: Dinoprost; PI: phosphatidylinositol; PS: phosphatidylserine; SM: sphingomyelin
  2. Relative concentrations: ↑ = upregulated, ↓ = downregulated
  3. Correlation coefficient and VIP value were obtained from OPLS-DA analysis
  4. §p value determined from Student’s t test