Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of follow-up data between the two groups of patients

From: A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation

Follow-up data

Time

EB group (n = 33)

CS group (n = 34)

Independent group t-value

P value

VAS

Immediately post

5.82 ± 1.67

6.06 ± 2.10

 − 0.518

0.606

3 months post

2.09 ± 1.18

3.32 ± 1.34

 − 3.985

0.000

Last follow-up

0.94 ± 0.75

1.00 ± 0.82

 − 0.317

0.753

F value

 

134.528

91.079

  

P value

 

0.000

0.000

  

AOFAS

Immediately post

41.21 ± 8.04

41.41 ± 7.44

 − 0.106

0.916

3 months post

78.09 ± 9.11

68.50 ± 8.89

4.360

0.000

Last follow-up

95.33 ± 5.70

92.70 ± 5.69

1.888

0.064

F value

 

525.355

422.517

  

P value

 

0.000

0.000

  

TFCS

Immediately post

3.87 ± 0.55

3.93 ± 0.53

 − 0.443

0.660

3 months post

3.96 ± 0.76

3.83 ± 0.63

0.772

0.443

Last follow-up

3.95 ± 0.75

3.88 ± 0.62

0.393

0.696

F value

 

0.147

0.230

  

P value

 

0.865

0.796

  

TFOS

Immediately post

7.97 ± 1.18

8.30 ± 1.06

 − 1.198

0.235

3 months post

8.25 ± 0.97

8.28 ± 0.97

 − 0.108

0.914

Last follow-up

8.22 ± 1.18

8.21 ± 1.19

0.067

0.947

F value

 

0.726

0.095

  

P value

 

0.488

0.909

  
  1. The bold words in the chart indicate statistical significance
  2. CS cortical screw, EB encircling and binding, VAS visual analog pain score, AOFAS American Foot Surgery Association Ankle-Hindfoot Score, TFCS tibiofibular space, TFOS tibiofibular overlap distance