Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of the meta-analysis results

From: Pain mechanisms in complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative sensory testing outcomes

Measurement

Location

Effect size and 95%CI

p value

Magnitude of effect size

Heterogeneity

Quality of evidence based on GRADE assessment

Cold detection threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 0.66; 95% CI, − 0.93, − 0.39

p < 0.01

Medium

I2 = 60%; p = 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.32; 95% CI, − 0.58, − 0.05

p = 0.02

Small

I2 = 59%; p = 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Warm detection threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22, 0.73

p < 0.01

Small

I2 = 57%; p = 0.02

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.55

p = 0.01

Small

I2 = 51%; p = 0.03

Low-quality evidence

Thermal sensory limen (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.29

p < 0.01

Large

I2 = 65%; p = 0.02

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40, 0.83

p < 0.01

Medium

I2 = 48%; p = 0.06

Low-quality evidence

Mechanical detection threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.40

p = 0.02

Small

I2 = 0%; p = 0.63

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14, 0.53

p = 0.01

Small

I2 = 1%; p = 0.41

Low-quality evidence

Vibration detection threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.17, 0.72

p < 0.02

Small

I2 = 31%; p = 0.2

Moderate-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.09, 0.52

P < 0.01

Small

I2 = 6%; p = 0.38

Moderate-quality evidence

Cold pain threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.41, 1.10

p < 0.01

Medium

I2 = 72%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19, 0.53

p < 0.01

Small

I2 = 7%; p = 0.38

Moderate-quality evidence

Heat pain threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 0.41; 95% CI,

− 0.63, − 0.20

p < 0.01

Small

I2 = 45%; p = 0.05

Moderate-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.30; 95% CI, − 0.46, − 0.15

P < 0.01

Small

I2 = 0%; p = 0.49

Moderate-quality evidence

Mechanical pain threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 3.66; 95% CI, − 5.95, − 1.37

p = 0.01

Large

I2 = 98%; p < 0.01

Very low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, − 0.37, 0.52

p = 0.74

Negligible difference

I2 = 0%; p = 0.36

Low-quality evidence

Muscle pressure pain threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 1.41; 95% CI, − 1.68, − 1.14

p < 0.01

Large

I2 = 52%; p = 0.03

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.38; 95% CI, − 0.69, − 0.07

p = 0.02

Small

I2 = 84%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Joint pressure pain threshold (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 2.92; 95% CI, − 3.47, − 2.37

p < 0.01

Large

I2 = 0%; p = 0.97

Moderate-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.54; 95% CI, − 1.93, 0.86

p = 0.45

Medium

I2 = 92%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Mechanical pain sensitivity (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.59;95% CI, 0.27, 0.9

p = 0.02

Medium

I2 = 41%; p = 0.15

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, − 0.23, 0.93

p = 0.24

Small

I2 = 77%; p < 0.02

Very low-quality evidence

Wind up ratio (adults)

Affected

SMD, 0.2; 95% CI, − 0.17, 0.56

p = 0.30

Small

I2 = 66%; p = 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, − 0.38, 1.13

p = 0.33

Small

I2 = 60%; p = 0.11

Low-quality evidence

Pain ratings (adults)

Affected

SMD, 1.29;95% CI, 0.67, 1.91

p < 0.01

Large

I2 = 68%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.85;95% CI, 0.48, 1.22

p < 0.01

Large

I2 = 0%; p = 0.59

Low-quality evidence

Area after pinprick hyperalgesia (adults)

Affected

SMD, 3.15;95% CI, 2.13, 4.16

p = 0.01

Large

I2 = 54%; p = 0.14

Low-quality evidence

Level of pleasantness (adults)

Affected

SMD, − 0.97; 95% CI, − 1.51, − 0.44

p = 0.03

Large

I2 = 0%; p = 0.99

Moderate-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.52; 95% CI, − 1.44, 0.41

p = 0.27

Medium

I2 = 67%; p = 0.08

Low-quality evidence

Cold detection threshold (children)

Affected

SMD, − 0.85; 95% CI, − 1.62, − 0.08

p = 0.03

Large

I2 = 85%; p = 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.48; 95% CI, − 1.93, 0.97

p = 0.52

Small

I2 = 96%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Warm detection threshold (children)

Affected

SMD, 0.82; 95% CI, − 0.66, 2.29)

p = 0.28

Large

I2 = 96%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.82; 95% CI, − 0.59, − 1.05

p = 0.48

Large

I2 = 97%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Cold pain threshold (children)

Affected

SMD, 1.23;95% CI, 0.05, 2.41

p = 0.04

Large

I2 = 93%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, − 0.06; 95% CI, − 0.33, 0.22

p = 0.67

Negligible difference

I2 = 0%; p = 56

Low-quality evidence

Heat pain threshold (children)

Affected

SMD, − 0.05; 95% CI, − 1.09, 0.99

p = 0.92

Negligible difference

I2 = 93%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

Remote

SMD, 0.67; 95% CI,

− 1.68, 3.02

p = 0.58

Medium

I2 = 98%; p < 0.01

Low-quality evidence

  1. CI confidence interval, SMD standardized mean difference