Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The efficacy of gait rehabilitations for the treatment of incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

RCT design

Conflict of interest

n

Age (years)

Male (%)

Time of injury (month)

Level of injury

ASIA scale

Hornby TG [31]

2005

USA

Parallel

No

35

N/A

N/A

N/A

Above T10

BCD

Dobkin B [32]

2006

USA

Parallel

No

146

26.8

76

N/A

C4-L3

BCD

Dobkin B [26]

2007

USA

Parallel

No

146

N/A

76

N/A

C4-L3

BCD

Alexeeva N [24]

2011

USA

Parallel

No

35

39.9

51

78.28

C2-T10

CD

Field-Fote EC [17]

2011

USA

Parallel

No

74

41.3

68

N/A

T10 or above

CD

Lucareli PR [28]

2011

Brazil

Parallel

No

30

31

46

9.85

C4-L2

CD

Alcobendas-Maestro M [29]

2012

Spain

Parallel

No

80

47.4

58

4.25

C2-T12

CD

Jaynie F [39]

2014

Canada

Crossover

No

22

46

N/A

64.2

C1-L1

N/A

Kapadia N [27]

2014

Canada

Parallel

No

34

55.3

61

114.36

C2-T12

CD

Labruyere R [38]

2014

Switzerland

Crossover

No

9

59

55

50

C4-T11

CD

Esclarin-Ruz A [33]

2014

Spain

Parallel

No

88

41.9

67

4.1

C1-L3

CD

Shin JC [35]

2014

Korea

Parallel

No

60

45.6

56

3.04

C-T

D

Tang Q [30]

2014

China

Parallel

No

30

38.6

100

N/A

T8-L3

D

Senthilvelkumar T [36]

2015

India

Parallel

No

16

35.2

68

5.9

C5-C8

C

Lin HD [34]

2016

China

Parallel

No

16

45.8

50

3.22

C4-L2

CD

Chang SH [25]

2018

USA

Parallel

No

9

57.7

55

138.84

C4-T12

CD

Edwards DJ [37]

2022

USA

Parallel

No

25

47

60

81.76

C1-L4

CD

  1. RCT, randomized controlled trial, ASIA, the American Spinal Injury Association (B, sensory incomplete but no motor function is preserved below the level of injury, C, motor incomplete; muscle power grades 0-2, and D, motor incomplete; muscle power grade ≤ 3), N/A, not available