TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis

Table 6 Methodological assessment according to six domains of potential biases (Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool)

RCT Study = 2	Random sequence generation	Allocation concealment	Blinding of participants and personnel	Blinding of outcome assessment	Incomplete outcome data	Selective reporting	Other bias
Wang [25]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low	Low	Unclear
Zhao [26]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low	Low	Unclear

The RCTs’ methodological quality and basis were assessed as follows: randomization, allocation concealment, blind method, selective reporting, group similarity at baseline, incomplete outcome data, compliance, the timing of outcome assessments, and intention-to-treat analysis
RCT randomized controlled trials

ISSN: 1749-799X