Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of patient demographic details for each study

From: TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis

Author

TiRobot/conventional

Patients

Mean age (years)

Female gender (%)

BMI

Type of injury

Gu [28]

15/15

72/79

26.7/40

22.48/2.13

Fall (4/3), traffic accident (7/7), high‐level fall (3/3); crush (1/2)

Han et al. [32]

38/25

38.66/40.08

71.1/76

25.85/24.72

NA

Hu et al. [27]

12/12

42.3/43.9

33.3/41.7

28.73/28.19

Traffic accident (7/6), high‐level fall (3/3); crush (2/3)

Li et al. [29]

47/48

40.3/41.5

70.2/27.1

NA

Traffic accident (10/8), high‐level fall (21/23); crush (16/17)

Liu et al. [33]

24/21

37.4/39.8

37.5/40

29.8/28.9

Traffic accident (10/11), high‐level fall (8/7); crush (6/3)

Liu et al. [30]

10/32

36/34

20/25

NA

Total: Traffic accident (34), high‐level fall (6); Other (2)

Long et al. [31]

56/35

35.95/35.68

42.9/40

NA

Traffic accident (39/15), high‐level fall (14/19); Crush (3/1)

Wang et al. [25]

23/22

36/43

33/46.6

NA

NA

Wang et al. [34] (S1)

59/29

44.02/43.66

39.35/42.5

NA

NA

Wang et al. [34] (S2)

26/14

39.35/42.5

26.9/35.7

NA

NA

Wang et al. [35]

32/21

40.8/39.9

43.75/47.6

22.9/23.8

Traffic accident (12/8), high‐level fall (12/7); Crush (8/6)

Zhao et al. [26]

7/5

39/42

28.6/40

19.37/20.21

NA

  1. Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index. Summary of patient demographic information for each study including number of patients, gender, age, BMI, and type of injury