Table 2 The relationship between SNPs related to NDUFV2 and LDD

rs145497186

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

90

0

85

7

7.122

0.008

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

45

0

39

7

7.418

0.006

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

45

0

46

0

–

1.000

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

45

0

39

7

7.418

0.006

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

45

0

39

0

–

0.944

rs28742109

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

69

21

81

11

4.064

0.004

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

28

17

35

11

2.053

0.152

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

41

4

46

0

4.277

0.039

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

28

13

35

11

0.659

0.417

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

28

4

35

0

4.653

0.031

rs12955018

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

86

4

80

12

4.195

0.041

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

41

4

36

10

2.885

0.089

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

45

0

44

2

2.000

0.157

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

41

4

36

8

1.647

0.199

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

41

0

36

2

2.214

0.137

rs987850

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

70

20

82

10

4.259

0.039

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

26

19

36

10

4.396

0.036

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

44

1

46

0

1.034

0.309

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

26

18

36

10

1.501

0.221

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

26

1

36

0

0.355

0.244

rs8093805

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

56

34

73

19

6.464

0.011

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

18

27

31

15

6.867

0.009

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

38

7

42

4

1.007

0.316

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

18

20

31

11

5.877

0.015

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

18

7

31

4

2.675

0.102

rs12965084

Allelic Model (1 vs. 2)

56

34

73

19

6.464

0.011

Dominant Model (11 vs. 12 + 22)

18

27

29

17

4.837

0.028

Recessive Model (11 + 12 vs. 22)

38

7

44

2

3.206

0.073

Heterozygous Model (11 vs. 12)

18

20

29

15

2.865

0.091

Homozygous Model (11 vs. 22)

18

7

29

2

4.764

0.029