Skip to main content

Table 1 Main baseline characteristics of the included studies

From: Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year)

Country

Study design

Simultaneous bilateral THA

Staged bilateral THA

Mean follow-up (range)

n

Age (mean, year)

Gender (male/female)

BMI (mean. Kg/m2)

ASA (1/2/3/4) (percentage)

n

Age (mean, years)

Gender (male/female)

BMI (mean. Kg/m2)

ASA (1/2/3/4) (percentage)

Time interval between stages

Agarwal et al. (2016)

India

Retrospective cohort

48

52

20:28

–

–

56

54

26:30

–

–

4.2 days

70 (36–82 months)

Aghayev et al. (2010)

Switzerland

Registry

247

59

116:131

–

–

1572

62.5

786:786

–

–

–

60 months

Alfaro-Adrián et al. (1999)

Brazil

Retrospective cohort

95

65

40:55

–

43/37/19/1

107

63.9

42:65

–

60/29/8/3

10.1 months

–

Berend et al. (2007)

USA

Retrospective cohort

167

52.7

100:67

29.7

–

110

57.3

47:63

30.8

–

8.1 months

28.5 months

Bhan et al. (2006)

India

Randomized clinical trial

83

46.6

54:29

–

59/31/10/0

85

43.4

51:34

–

64/29/6/1

3–7 months

60 months

Brown et al. (2017)

USA

Retrospective cohort

15

56.9

8:7

26.4

Mean = 1.8 ± 0.6

44

60.2

24:20

27.8

Mean = 2.2 ± 0.6

0.90 ± 0.89 years

3 months

Calabro et al. (2020)

Australia

Registry

2779

–

6214:6145**

–

19/60/20/1

9580

–

6214:6145**

–

10/58/30/2

–

Minimum = 1.5 years

Eggli et al. (1995)

Switzerland

Prospective cohort

64

54

133:122**

–

–

191

61

133:122**

–

–

96 days

1.5 years

Garland et al. (2015)

Sweden

Registry

1680

–

767:913

26.9

33/54/13/0

40,558

–

16,356:24,202

27.4

23/61/16/0

–

to the day of death

Goh et al. (2022)

USA

Retrospective cohort

220

60.8

341:330Δ

30

–

170

64

123:210Δ

30.7

–

–

3 months

Guo et al. (2020)

China

Retrospective cohort

863

49

604:259

24.7

31/68/1/0

282

52.5

152:130

24.8

27/69/4/0

–

Minimum = 3 months

Hooper et al. (2009)

New Zealand

Registry

303

61

–

–

–

743

61

–

–

–

–

6 months

Hou et al. (2021)

China

Retrospective case control

100

54

30:70

24.6

–

100

57

29:71

24.6

–

–

–

Houdek et al. (2017)

USA

Retrospective case control

94

52.2

54:40

27.1

7/78/15/0

94

52.1

54:40

27.8

7/80/13/0

3 months

48 months

Inoue et al. (2021)

USA

Retrospective cohort

256

58.2

155:101

27.8

–

387

62.5

176:211

28.4

–

31.5 months

90 days

Johnston et al. (2011)

Scotland

Retrospective cohort

68

61.5

26:42

27.4

–

526

66.5

208:318

27.2

–

–

1.5 years (24–108 months)

Kamath et al. (2016)

Switzerland

Retrospective cohort

41

60.7

24:17

–

18/58/24/0

44

68.7

18:26

–

12/65/23/0

–

Minimum = 24 months

Kim et al. (2017)

South Korea

Retrospective cohort

63

43.1

39:24

22.9

30/60/10/0

60

43.5

32:28

23.3

30/66/4/0

4.8 months

60.2 months

Lindberg‑Larsen et al. (2013)

Denmark

Registry

103

55.7

59:44

–

–

577

66.9

234:343

–

–

–

Max = 415 days

Lorenze et al. (1998)

USA

Retrospective case control

40

–

20:20

–

–

40

–

20:20

–

–

–

–

Martin et al. (2016)

Canada

Retrospective case control

12

58.9

–

27.9

Mean = 2.2 ± 0.4

12

63.9

–

26.3

Mean = 2.2 ± 0.6

–

–

Mou et al. (2021)

China

Retrospective cohort

11

–

10:1

22.7

–

12

–

10:2

22.7

–

40.8 days

80.9 months

Panchal et al. (2021)

India

Retrospective case control

54

–

27:27

–

–

54

–

27:27

–

–

–

62.4 months

Partridge et al. (2019)

UK

Registry

2507

60.6

1178:1329

–

–

9915

65.5

3966:5949

–

–

–

3 months

Parvizi et al. (2006)

USA

Retrospective case control

98

53

53:45

28.8

11/72/17/0

98

65

46:52

30.2

1/51/48/0

138 days

Minimum = 6 months

Poultsides et al. (2017)

USA

Retrospective cohort

1946

56.3

1000:946

–

–

1839

63.1

746:1093

–

–

5–365 days

–

Quadri et al. (2015)

Pakistan

Retrospective cohort

34

39

30:4

25

29/57/7/7

14

42

6:8

27

14/57/29/0

–

–

Rasouli et al. (2014)

USA

National database

14,798

58.4

–

–

–

1532

60.3

–

–

–

–

–

Reuben et al. (1998)

USA

Retrospective case control

7

49

4:3

–

Mean = 2.5 ± 0.5

8

57

1:7

–

Mean = 1.7 ± 0.7

–

–

Saito et al. (2010)

Japan

Retrospective case control

49

59

6:43

23.5

–

40

61.9

4:36

23.8

–

30.7 days

5.5 years (24–120 months)

Salvati et al. (1978)

USA

Retrospective cohort

122

–

–

–

–

339

–

–

–

–

–

36 months

Schlegelmilch et al. (2017)

Canada

Retrospective case control

26

–

–

–

–

6

–

–

–

–

–

12 months

Seol et al. (2015)

Korea

Retrospective cohort

147

41.9

112:35

23.7

54/41/5/0

59

46.3

45:14

23.8

46/46/8/0

18.7 months

34.4 months

Shih et al. (1985)

China

Retrospective cohort

20

40.7

17:3

–

–

15

46.6

13:2

–

–

–

365–530 days

Taheriazam et al. (2019)

Iran

Randomized clinical trial

90

59.3

59:31

28.4

score 1 or 2

90

59.1

52:38

28.7

score 1 or 2

6–12 months

24 months

Tan et al. (2019)

China

Retrospective cohort

256

52

143:113

23.8

41/49/8/2

256

54.9

120:136

23.8

38/54/7/1

–

3 months

Triantafyllopoulos et al. (2016)

USA

Retrospective cohort

1808

56.3

930:878

–

–

4842

62.3

1995:2847

–

–

249–1710 days

112.6 months

Villa et al. (2019)

USA

Retrospective cohort

61

55.4

40:21

27.5

15/69/16/0

143

63.1

63:80

27.7

7/69/24/0

461

–

  1. THA total hip arthroplasty, n number, BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiology
  2. **This is a report of the gender in whole sample size (not reported in separated groups)
  3. Δ This is a report of the gender in whole total joint arthroplasty sample size (not reported in separated groups; THA and TKA)