Skip to main content

Table 4 Quantitative analysis of endings

From: Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review

Study

Decompression

Postoperative cervical instability

Average surgery time (minutes)

Blood loss (ml)

Stay in hospital (days)

Complications

MacNab

Yu [16]

YES

NO

44

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

NO

Excellent: 8 (50%)

Good: 6 (37.5%)

Fair: 2 (12.5%)

Qiu [17]

YES

NO

90

40

Not mentioned

NO

Not mentioned

Luo [18]

YES

NO

62

Not mentioned

1.6

1 case in dural tears

1 case in transient postoperative dysesthesia

Excellent: 19(57.6%)

Good: 13(39.4%)

Fair: 1(3.0%)

Haijun [19]

YES

NO

75.46

20.33

4.66

1 case in aggravated pain and numbness

2 cases in dural tear

1 case in decreased muscle strength

1 case in disk herniation recurrence

Excellent: 35(70.0%)

Good: 12(24.0%)

Acceptable: 2(4.0%)

Poor: 1(2.0%)

Oshima [20]

YES

NO

Not mentioned

18

Not mentioned

NO

Not mentioned

Liu [13]

YES

NO

74.92

Not mentioned

3.17

1 case in hypoaesthesia

Not mentioned

Zhang [21]

YES

NO

75

40

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Ross [22]

YES

NO

142

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

1 case in no motor function in

the right hand intrinsic muscles

Not mentioned

Zhang [23]

YES

NO

119

360

Not mentioned

1 case upper limb motion dysfunction

1case mini-screw was loosened

Excellent: 13(28.8%)

Good: 25(55.6%)

Fair: 7(15.6%)

Siemionow [24]

YES

NO

59.15

32.83

Not mentioned

1 case in right shoulder pain

Not mentioned

Yadav [25]

YES

NO

135

30

2.2

1 case in minor dural tears

3 case in minor bleedings from muscles

2 case in c5 root injury

Not mentioned

Dahdaleh [14]

YES

NO

Not mentioned

32.3

1.6

NO

Excellent: 4 (40.0%)

Good: 3(30.0%)

Fair: 2(20.0%)

Poor: 1(10.0%)

Yabuki [26]

YES

NO

163.6

45.5

Not mentioned

NO

Not mentioned

Adamson [32]

YES

NO

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

1.1

Not mentioned

Excellent: 91(91.0%)

Good: 6(6.0%)

Fair: 3(3.0%)