Skip to main content

Table 3 GRADE evidence profile of PFN versus DHS for patients with trochanteric fracture included in randomized clinical trials.

From: Comparative effectiveness research on proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw in patients with trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Outcome

Number of trials (≤ 12 total)

No. of patients (N ≤ 1889 total)

Follow-up, months (min; max)

Serious risk of bias?

Inconsistency: I2 (%)

Serious indirectness?

Serious imprecision?

Serious risk of reporting bias?

Effect size (95%CI)

Quality of the evidence

Operative time

11

1667

Intraoperation

Yes

Yes(98%)

No

Yes

No

− 9.49(− 18.74 to 0.25)

Very low

Blood loss

8

781

Intraoperation

Yes

Yes (95%)

No

No

No

− 158.20 (− 203.05 to − 113.34)

Low

Fluoroscopy time

7

1371

Intraoperation

Yes

Yes (99%)

No

Yes

No

0.43 (0.18 to 0.68)

Low

Closed reduction

5

1042

Post-operation

Yes

No (52%)

No

No

No

1.02 (0.99 to 1.05)

Moderate

Non-Union

5

1091

12;12

Yes

No (0%)

No

No

No

0.93(0.44 to 1.96)

Moderate

Implant Failure

10

1749

4;24

Yes

No (32%)

No

No

No

0.78 (0.35 to 1.75))

Moderate

Revision

4

886

12;12

Yes

No (44%)

No

No

No

0.84 (0.22 to 3.15)

Moderate