Skip to main content

Table 1 The demographic and surgical details of the patients

From: Modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure for complex lower extremity reconstruction

Case

Sex

Age

Injury type

Injury location

Soft tissue defect (cm2), fracture status

Artery injury

Comorbidities

Flap type

Flap area (cm2)

Complica-tion

Second procedure

1

F

55

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

18 × 15, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

Hypertension

Single

22 × 17

/

Ilizarov

2

M

55

Stubborn ulcer

Crus (R)

24 × 14

aTA and pTA

/

Single

27 × 16

/

/

3

M

33

Traffic accident

Knee and Crus (L)

27 × 13, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Single

30 × 16

/

Ilizarov

4

M

29

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

22 × 11, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Bilobed

25 × 12

/

Ilizarov

5

M

24

Degloving injury

Crus and foot (L)

22 × 16 (entire planta)

aTA and pTA

/

Single

24 × 19

/

/

6

M

10

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

22 × 15, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Single

24 × 18

/

Ilizarov

7

M

26

Stubborn ulcer

Medial malleolus (L)

14 × 8

pTA

/

Bilobed

17 × 8

/

/

8

M

20

Traffic accident

Crus (L)

17 × 10, Gustilo IIIB

PA and aTA

/

Single

19 × 12

/

Ilizarov

9

F

18

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

20 × 14, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Single

23 × 17.5

Local lysis

debridementand Ilizarov

10

M

60

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

20 × 12, Gustilo IIIB

aTA and pTA

/

Single

24 × 15

/

Ilizarov

11

M

48

Traffic accident

Dorsum pedis (L)

21 × 18

aTA and DPA

Hypertension

Single

24 × 21

/

/

12

M

64

Traffic accident

crus (L)

12 × 8, Gustilo IIIB

aTA and pTA

Diabetes

Single

14 × 10

/

Ilizarov

13

M

23

Traffic accident

Crus (L)

15 × 10, Gustilo IIIB

aTA and pTA

/

Bilobed

22 × 9

/

Ilizarov

14

M

38

Traffic accident

Crus (L)

26 × 13, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Single

30 × 15

/

Ilizarov

15

F

42

Traffic accident

Crus (L)

17 × 11, Gustilo IIIB

aTA and pTA

/

Single

19 × 14

Local lysis

debridement and Ilizarov

16

M

37

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

18 × 10, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Single

21 × 12

/

Ilizarov

17

M

21

Traffic accident

Crus and dorsum pedis (L)

15 × 9, Gustilo IIIB

aTA, pTA and DPA

/

Single

17 × 11

/

Ilizarov

18

M

44

Stubborn ulcer

crus (L)

15 × 8

aTA

/

Single

17 × 10

/

/

19

F

46

Stubborn ulcer

Medial malleolus (R)

12 × 6

pTA

/

Single

14 × 7.5

/

/

20

M

60

Stubborn ulcer

Crus (L)

17 × 12

PA and pTA

hypertension

Single

20 × 14

/

/

21

M

22

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

22 × 12, Gustilo IIIC

PA, aTA and pTA

/

Bilobed

26 × 13

/

Ilizarov

22

F

46

Traffic accident

Crus (R)

12 × 10, Gustilo IIIB

aTA and pTA

hypertension

Single

15 × 13

/

Ilizarov

 

M (77%)

10–64

Traffic accident (73%)

Crus (86%), L (55%)

12–27 × 6–18

Two or more (86%)

 

Single (82%)

14–30 × 7.5–21

Local lysis (9%)

Ilizarov (68%)

  1. M male, F female, PA peroneal artery, aTA anterior tibial artery, pTA posterior tibial artery, DPA dorsalis pedis artery, Ilizarov Ilizarov technique, patients were listed by admission time