Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison according to the SDSG grade at 12 months

From: Does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) influence functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in isthmic spondylolisthesis?

Parameters

SDSG

Test§

p value

SDSG 2 (N = 9)

SDSG 3 (N = 15)

(Sig.)

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back

Mean ± SD

1.44 ± 0.72

2 ± 0.92

− 1.462

0.144

Median (range)

1 (1–3)

2 (1–3)

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for leg

Mean ± SD

0.77 ± 0.44

1.13 ± 1.99

− 0.341

0.733

Median (range)

1 (0–1)

1 (0–8)

 

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Mean ± SD

13.78 ± 2.108

16.87 ± 12.495

− 0.272

0.786

Median (range)

14 (11–17)

15 (10–61)

 

Pelvic tilt (PT)

Mean ± SD

17.02 ± 2.99

21.53 ± 3.95

− 2.534

0.011

Median (range)

16 (12.30–22.20)

21.90 (14–27)

(S)

Sacral slope (SS)

Mean ± SD

35.4778 ± 2.28844

45.8733 ± 4.06966

− 8.006

< 0.001

Median (range)

35.8(32.1–40)

45 (39.7–52.9)

(HS)

Lumbar lordosis (LL)

Mean ± SD

52.46 ± 4.95

61.22 ± 5.64

− 3.139

0.002

Median (range)

50 (47.40–59)

60 (50.80–68.90)

(S)

Mismatch

Mean ± SD

5.22 ± 3.31

6.80 ± 2.76

− 1.283

0.2

Median (range)

4.60 (1.60–9.50)

7.20 (0.10–9.90)

 

L1–L4

Mean ± SD

23 ± 6.09

30.4 ± 5.32

− 2.419

0.016

Median (range)

20 (17– 32.2)

29.8 (22.3–38.6)

(S)

L4–S1

Mean ± SD

37.44 ± 3.19

39.74 ± 4.64

− 1.404

0.16

Median (range)

38.10 (33.70–43.30)

41.90 (31.20–45.20)

 

Segmental lordosis (SL)

Mean ± SD

20.62 ± 3.01

20.74 ± 8

− 1.343

0.179

Median (range)

21.90 (14.60–23.60)

17.30 (13.90–37)

 
  1. § Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05 is significant. Sig.: Significance