Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis of the factors for each range-of-motion [ROM ( +) and ROM (−)] group

From: Optimal combined anteversion range for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study

Factors

Total

N = 133

ROM ( +)

N = 111

ROM (−)

N = 22

P values

Age (years) a

 

63.4 ± 11.0

59.2 ± 9.2

0.03

Sex (hips)

    

 Male

41

29

12

0.01

 Female

92

82

10

 

BMI (kg/m2) a

 

24.4 ± 4.2

23.8 ± 3.7

0.71

Diagnosis (hips)

    

 OA

101

88

15

0.12

 ONFH

24

18

6

 

 FNF

5

5

0

 

 RA

1

0

1

 

Implants (hips)

    

 G7-Taperloc

80

68

12

0.63

 SQRUM-J-taper

53

43

10

 

Yoshimine`s CA (degrees) a

91.1 ± 7.4

90.5 ± 5.6

93.6 ± 13.1

0.06

Widmer`s CA (degrees) a

38.0 ± 5.6

37.6 ± 4.3

40.2 ± 9.8

0.06

Absolute error of Yoshimine`s CA (degrees) a

5.7 ± 4.6

4.5 ± 3.2

11.9 ± 5.5

< 0.01

Absolute error of Widmer`s CA (degrees) a

4.4 ± 3.6

3.5 ± 2.5

8.8 ± 4.8

< 0.01

Each factors of CA

    

 Stem anteversion (degrees) a

5.4 ± 4.4

5.1 ± 4.0

6.9 ± 5.5

0.18

 Cup radiographic inclination (degrees) a

3.1 ± 2.3

3.0 ± 2.3

3.7 ± 2.4

0.17

 Cup anatomical anteversion (degrees) a

4.3 ± 3.6

3.9 ± 3.1

6.0 ± 5.3

0.08

  1. BMI body mass index, OA osteoarthritis, ONFH osteonecrosis of the femoral head, FNF femoral neck fractures, RA rheumatoid arthritis, CA combined anteversion
  2. aValues are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (range)