Table 4 Previous accuracy measurements reported from different studies and the current study
Study’s author | Sample size | Type templating | Cup size accuracy % (± 0/ ± 1/ ± 2) | Stem size accuracy % (± 0/ ± 1/ ± 2) | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current study | 391 | Digital | 28.9/63.9/83.1 | 27.2/61.0/78.6 | Current study |
Wedemeyer et al. | 40 | Digital | 40/77.5/92.5 | 37.5/95/100 | [37] |
Davila et al. | 36 | Digital | 39/86/94 | 19/72/94 | [21] |
EL Steinberg et al. | 73 | Digital | 50.7/89/100 | –/87/96 | [20] |
Kristoffersson E et al. | 50 | Digital | 42.9/80.4/ | 38.2/81.8/ | [36] |
Carter et al. | 64 | Digital | – | 43.2/82.4/95.9 | [7] |
Eggli et al. | 100 | Scanned films-software | –/90/– | –/92/– | [40] |
Dutka J et al. | 348 | Analog radiograms | 85* (± 1) | 77*(± 1) | [41] |
Digital | 82(± 1) | 72(± 1) | |||
Choi JK et al. | 80 | Digital | 37.8/80.6/– | 64.4/98.8/– | [31] |
Gamble P et al. | 117 | Digital | 38/80/– | 35/85/– | [35] |
Onlay templating | 20/60/– | 40/85/– | |||
Efe T et al. | 169 | Digital | 33.7/77.5/– | 36/82.3/– | [32] |
Bertram Theet al. | 238 | Digital (cemented) | 72(± 1) | 79(± 1) | [14] |
Digital (uncemented) | 52(± 1) | 66(± 1) | |||
Whiddon DR et al. | 51 | Digital | 39/78/96 | 61/90/96 | [34] |
Manual | 67% (± 1) | 82% (± 1) | |||
Shaarani SR et al. | 100 | Digital | 38/80/98 | 36/75/98 | [42] |
Shin JK et al. | 200 | Digital | 65/96.6/– | 69.1/97.8/– | [33] |