Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups

From: Efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures

Variables

The study group (32)

The control group (32)

Mean age (years)

43.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰9.12

42.91ā€‰Ā±ā€‰9.09

M/F

18/14

19/13

Laterality

Ā Left/right

18/14

19/13

Causes of injury

Ā Car accidents

28

29

Ā Injury due to fall from height

4

3

Concurrent injuries

Ā Patella fracture

1

1

Ā Rib fracture

3

2

Ā Frontal bone fracture

1

2

Ā Head injury

1

1

Femoral head fracture line

Ā Fracture line below the fossa capitis femoris

7

5

Ā Fracture line above the fossa capitis femoris

3

2

Letournelā€“Judet classification

Ā Posterior wall acetabular fracture

8

7

Ā Posterior column and posterior wall acetabular fracture

3

2

Ā Transverse and posterior wall acetabular fracture

2

1

  1. #Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 vs. the control group