Skip to main content

Table 2 Relation between stem valgus alignment and BMD change at 24Ā months post-operatively in the Gruen zones

From: Peri-prosthetic bone remodeling of hydroxyapatite-coated compaction short stem was not affected by stem alignment

Ā 

Outlier versus non-outlier (valgus alignment)

HA full compaction

Tapered wedge

Outlier (nā€‰=ā€‰27)

Non-outlier (nā€‰=ā€‰32)

p value

Effect size (Cohenā€™s d)

95% CI

Outlier (nā€‰=ā€‰9)

Non-outlier (nā€‰=ā€‰47)

p value

Effect size (Cohenā€™s d)

95% CI

Zone1

0.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.17

0.92ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.09

0.141

0.15

āˆ’ā€‰0.36 to 0.66

0.92ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.12

0.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.14

0.315

āˆ’ā€‰0.15

āˆ’ā€‰0.86 to 0.57

Zone2

0.92ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.14

0.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.09

0.159

āˆ’ā€‰0.17

āˆ’ā€‰0.69 to 0.34

0.90ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.18

1.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.10

0.014*

0.87

0.14ā€“1.60

Zone3

1.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.07

1.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.03

0.084

āˆ’ā€‰0.38

āˆ’ā€‰0.9 to 0.134

1.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.13

1.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.18

0.805

0.06

āˆ’ā€‰0.66 to 0.77

Zone4

1.04ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.07

1.04ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.04

0.382

0.00

āˆ’ā€‰0.51 to 0.51

1.05ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.06

1.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.05

0.054

āˆ’ā€‰0.78

āˆ’ā€‰1.5 to āˆ’ā€‰0.05

Zone5

1.05ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.10

1.03ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.03

0.505

āˆ’ā€‰0.28

āˆ’ā€‰0.80 to 0.23

1.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.16

1.05ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.12

0.825

0.24

āˆ’ā€‰0.48 to 0.95

Zone6

0.93ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.15

0.98ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.14

0.421

0.35

āˆ’ā€‰0.17 to 0.86

0.97ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.15

1.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.13

0.594

0.30

āˆ’ā€‰0.42 to 1.02

Zone7

0.82ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.16

0.81ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.24

0.979

āˆ’ā€‰0.05

āˆ’ā€‰0.56 to 0.46

0.84ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.19

0.83ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.15

0.948

āˆ’ā€‰0.06

āˆ’ā€‰0.78 to 0.65

  1. CI, confidence interval