Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of included studies (b)

From: Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

References

Follow-up

Functional evaluation

Mechanical axis

Positioning of the prosthesis

Complications (Navigated group vs. conventional group)

Operating time (SD) [Min]

Song et al. [21]

9 years

HSS, WOMAC

Yes

Yes

1 revision/2 knees were revised

NR

Zhang et al. [7]

2 years

KSS, KSFS

Yes

Yes

No case of complications

Navigated group: 59.4 ± 6.1

Conventional group: 62.1 ± 5.5

Manzotti et al. [12]

6 months

WOMAC, IKS

No

Yes

No case of complications

Navigated group: 47.4 ± 6.1

Conventional group: 35.4 ± 4.4

Valenzuela et al. [37]

NR

NR

Yes

Yes

NR

NR

Weber et al. [17]

18 months

KSS

NR

NR

2 patients were revised to a TKA/1 patient was revised to a TKA

Navigated group: 126.2 ± 21.25

Conventional group: 109.4 ± 18.25

Konyves et al. [20]

Navigated group: 6.9 years Conventional group: 8.9 years

OKS

No

No

NR

NR

Jung et al. [13]

NR

NR

No

Yes

One case of tibial side pin site infection/one case of intraoperative fracture, one case of infection

Navigated group: 98

Conventional group: 82

Lim et al. [35]

1 year

KSS

No

NR

No case of complications

NR

Rosenberger et al. [10]

NR

NR

Yes

NR

No case of complications

Navigated group: 81.8 ± 11.08

Conventional group: 70.85 ± 14.86

Jenny et al. [33]

NR

NR

NR

Yes

No case of complications

NR

Keene et al. [34]

NR

NR

NR

NR

No case of complications

Navigated group: 70

Conventional group: 53

Perlick et al. [36]

NR

NR

Yes

NR

No case of complications

Navigated group: 77 ± 14

Conventional group: 58 ± 11

Cossey and Spriggins [32]

17 months

OKS

Yes

Yes

2 deep venous thrombosis,1 wound infection/1 deep venous thrombosis and 1 superficial wound infection

Navigated group: 81

Conventional group: 58

Jenny and Boeri [15]

3 months

NR

Yes

Yes

NR

Navigated group: 86

Conventional group: 67

  1. KSS, Knee Society Score; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index; IKS, International Knee Society; OKS, Oxford Knee Score
  2. Yes, Better positioning of the prosthesis/mechanical axis through navigation; No, no difference; NR, no report