Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate in clinical treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study cohort

Study region

Study Design

Patients(I/C)

Sex(M/F)

Age (years)

Follow-up (months)

Location

Culture Results

Intervention

Local complications

Other Adverse Events

Outcomes

MINORS

Humm, 2014 [31]

UK

Retrospective outcome study

21/NA

18/3

49 (28–88)

16 (6–25)

21 tibia

4 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, 4 Polymicrobial, 3 Negative, 6 Other organisms

Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

7 aseptic wound leakage, 5 pin-tract infection

a transient acute kidney injury

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

8

Andreacchio, 2019 [32]

France

Retrospective outcome study

12/NA

8/4

10.3 (2–15)

24–72

3 tibia,4 femur, 2 humerus,1 clavicle,1radius,1 IV Metatarsal

3 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 7 Negative (other NS)

Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

None

None

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

9

Ferguson, 2014 [33]

UK

Retrospective outcome study

193(195 locations)/NA

150/43

46.1 (16.1–82)

44.44 (15.6–85.2)

88 tibia, 73 femur, 10 humerus, 6 ankle, 5 radius, 4 knee fusion, 4 pelvis, 3 calcaneum, 1 ulna, 1 forefoot

49 Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 10 Coagulase-negative staphylococci, 7 Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Escherichia coli, 4 Enterobacter cloacae (other NS)

Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

30 aseptic wound leakage, 9 collection of fluid and 9 refracture

7 death (other reason)

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

13

McKee, 2002 [15]

Canada

Prospective outcome study

25/NA

15/10

43 (27–69)

28 (20–38)

8 tibia, 6 femur, 3 ulna, 1 humerus

9 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterobacter cloacae, other polymicrobial infections

Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

8 aseptic wound leakage, 3 refracture, 2 persistent nonunion, 1 superficial wound necrosis, 1 hypertrophic nonunion

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

9

Gitelis, 2002 [34]

USA

Retrospective outcome study

6/NA

3/3

50 (26–85)

28 (18–40)

3 tibia, 3 femur

5 Staphylococcus aureus, 1 Polymicrobial infections

Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

None

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

8

Qin, 2020 [30]

China

Retrospective outcome study

33/NA

26/7

44.5 (17–67)

35.9 (12–75)

33 calcaneum

8 Staphylococcus aureus,6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterococcus faecalis, 2 Proteus mirabilis,2 Enterobacter cloacae,10 negative (other NS)

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

13 aseptic wound leakage

1 death (cardiovascular disease)

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

7

Ferrando, 2017 [35]

Spain

Retrospective comparative study

13/12

9/4

48 (17–67)

22 (16–29)

6 tibia, 4 calcaneum, 2 femur, 1 humerus

5 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 2 Methicillin-resistant S.aureus, 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Streptococcus agalactis,1 Escherichia coli,1 Polymicrobial infections

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

1 hematoma,1 mild seroma

None

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

15

Badie, 2019 [36]

Egypt

Prospective outcome study

30/NA

25/5

26.2 (17–53)

 > 12

14 tibia, 11 femur, 2 radius, 2 humerus, 1 ulna

15 S. aureus, 3 methicillin resistant S. aureus, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, 2 Escherichia coli, 2 Proteus mirabilis, 1 Salmonella, 1 Streptococcus, 2 polymicrobial infections, 2 negative

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

1 refracture

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate

11

Jiang, 2020 [23]

China

Retrospective outcome study

34/NA

27/7

41 (3–67)

26 (12–68)

34 calcaneum

5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterobacter cloacae, 2 Staphylococcus aureus (other NS)

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

11 aseptic wound leakage

1 death (other reason)

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

9

Zhou, 2020 [37]

China

Retrospective outcome study

42(43 locations)/NA

24/18

43.7 (23–74)

42.8 (12.8–77.5)

24 left tibia, 19 right tibia

11 Staphylococcus aureus, 3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Polymicrobial infections

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

13 paseptic wound leakage, 4 slight pain after a long-distance walk, 4 limb weakness or discomfort, 1 slight claudication

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

8

Qin, 2018 [29]

China

Retrospective comparative study

35/NA

26/9

38 (18–60)

33.7 (25 ~ 41)

35 tibia

15 Staphylococcus aureus, 5 Escherichia Coli, 3 Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, 2 Serratia Marcescens, 2 Acinetobacter Baumannii, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, other negative

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

8 pin-tract infection, 3 knee stiffness

None

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

7

Gramlich, 2017 [38]

Gemany

Retrospective outcome study

93/NA

59/34

62 (11–84)

11 (6–22)

35 femur, 28 tibia, 7 fibula, 5 humerus, 5 hip joint, 4 Radius, 3 talus,, 3 pelvis (other NS)

27 Staphylococcus aureus, 19 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Escherichia coli, 3 Klebsiella Pneumoniae (other NS)

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

NR

NR

Eradication rate

6

Ruan, 2021 [39]

China

Retrospective outcome study

35/NA

25/10

54 (34–82)

24–60

35 tibia

4 Staphylococcus aureus, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, 2 Streptococcus

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

5 anterolateral numbness of the iliac thigh, 2 relapse, 2 hematocele in the iliac bone area, 1 nonunion, 1 aseptic exudate

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

10

Gauland, 2011 [25]

USA

Retrospective outcome study

323/NA

NR

NR

60

Lower-Extremity (NS)

NR

Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate

NR

NR

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

8

Sun, 2017 [40]

China

Retrospective outcome study

12/NA

7/5

54 (16–72)

10.8 (6–18)

12 jaw

3 Staphylococcus aureus, 2 β-hemolytic streptococcu, 1 Escherichia coli, 1 Streptococcus viridans (other NS)

Debridement, vancomycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

2 aseptic wound leakage

None

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

7

Zhao, 2020 [41]

China

Retrospective comparative study

10/21

10/0

48 (28.98–67.42)

21.7 (15.8–27.6)

5 femur, 5 tibia

4 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Negative (other NS)

Debridement, vancomycin-impregnated calcium sulfate

3 aseptic wound leakage

None

Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage

14

  1. NR, not reported; NS, not specified