Skip to main content

Table 4 Clinical and radiologic results and complications from single-plate and double-plate group

From: Fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients: retrospective analysis of a case series treated with single or double plate

 

Single plate group

Group A (N = 42)

Double plate group

Group B (N = 40)

P value

Last follow up knee ROM

 Flexion contracture

5° (2°–10°)

4° (2°–6°)

 

 Further flexion

127° (95°–135°)

131° (94°–136°)

 

 ROM (FF-FC)

105° (90°–125°)

110.7° (90°–130°)

0.37

aLDFA

84.7° (81.7°–88.2°)

83.2° (81.3°–86.4°)

0.24

aPDFA

85.3° (81.5°–89.8°)

84.4° (82.6°–87.7°)

0.47

Lysholm knee score

63.62 (50–72)

67.1 (57–75)

0.44

Knee society score

84.2 (71–94)

82.9 (68–96)

0.53

Complications (total)

9 (21.4%)

3 (7.5%)

 

Non-union

0

1 (2.5%)

 

Metal failure

1 (2.4%)

0

 

Wound infection

8 (19%)

2 (5%)

 
  1. ROM. Range of motion; FF-FC, further flexion-flexion contracture; aLDFA, anatomic lateral distal femoral angle; aPDFA, anatomic posterior distal femoral angle