Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the variables UQYBT, MD, and sEMG on the PG and NPG

From: Function, strength, and muscle activation of the shoulder complex in Crossfit practitioners with and without pain: a cross-sectional observational study

Variable PG 95%CI NPG 95%CI p
UQYBT (%LL)      
Medial 118.4 ± 21.3 109.2 to 127.6 110.3 ± 10.5 107.2 to 113.4 0.055
Inferolateral 74.6 ± 14.9 68.1 to 81.1 72.1 ± 17.4 67.0 to 77.2 0.677
Superolateral 55.4 ± 14.7 49.0 to 61.8 53.0 ± 10.2 50.0 to 56.0 0.625
Composite 82.8 ± 14.2 76.7 to 89.0 78.4 ± 10.2 75.4 to 81.4 0.289
MD (N)      
ER 122.2 ± 38.6 105.5 to 138.9 134.8 ± 35.7 124.3 to 145.3 0.854
IR 113.1 ± 38.5 96.5 to 129.8 123.1 ± 40.6 111.1 to 135.0 0.984
ABDU 84.8 ± 26.8 73.1 to 96.4 100.3 ± 29.8 91.6 to 109.1 0.197
ADDU 95.0 ± 35.0 79.8; 110.1 108.7 ± 43.7 95.8; 121.6 0.851
sEMG (%MVC)      
UP 50.4 ± 11.2 45.5; 55.2 52.1 ± 8.5 49.6; 54.6 0.521
LT 47.7 ± 7.2 44.5; 50.8 51.9 ± 8.9 49.3; 54.6 0.038
PM 53.4 ± 12.7 47.9; 58.9 58.6 ± 10.9 55.4; 61.9 0.098
  1. No significant difference were found (p > 0.1)
  2. The values were presented as mean and standard deviation (% LL: percentage of limb length; N: Newton; % MVC: percentage of maximum voluntary contraction)