Function, strength, and muscle activation of the shoulder complex in Crossfit practitioners with and without pain: a cross-sectional observational study

Table 4 Comparison of the variables UQYBT, MD, and sEMG on the dominant side (DS) and non-dominant side (NDS) of NPG

Variable	DS	95% CI	NDS	95% CI	p
UQYBT (%LL)
Medial	110.3 ± 10.5	107.2 to 113.4	112.0 ± 10.6	108.9 to 115.2	0.410
Inferolateral	72.1 ± 17.4	67.0 to 77.2	73.7 ± 15.3	69.2 to 78.2	0.652
Superolateral	53.0 ± 10.2	50.0 to 56.0	55.5 ± 10.8	52.4 to 58.7	0.239
Composite	78.4 ± 10.2	75.4 to 81.4	80.5 ± 9.7	77.6 to 83.4	0.336
MD (N)
ER	134.8 ± 35.7	124.3 to 145.3	125.8 ± 37.2	114.9 to 136.8	0.221
IR	123.1 ± 40.6	111.1 to 135.0	119.6 ± 37.2	108.6 to 130.5	0.583
ABDU	100.3 ± 29.8	91.6 to 109.1	97.3 ± 29.9	88.5 to 106.1	0.632
ADDU	108.7 ± 43.7	95.8 to 121.6	102.4 ± 38.6	91.1 to 113.7	0.433
sEMG (%MVC)
UP	52.1 ± 8.5	49.6 to 54.6	50.9 ± 8.1	48.5 to 53.3	0.490
LT	51.9 ± 8.9	49.3 to 54.6	52.7 ± 9.6	49.8 to 55.5	0.694
PM	58.6 ± 10.9	55.4 to 61.9	57.0 ± 10.6	53.9 to 60.1	0.458

The values were presented as mean and standard deviation (% LL: percentage of limb length; N: Newton; % MVC: percentage of maximum voluntary contraction)

ISSN: 1749-799X