Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of literature on all studies regarding All-inside reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

From: Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

References

No of patients (male/female)

Study design

CMS

Mean age (± SD)

Graft type

Fixation technique

Subjective IKDC score change (follow-up)

Lysholm score change (follow-up)

Lachman test [score post-op] (follow-ups)

Tibial

Femoral

Yasen et al. [39]

108 (81/27)

Prospective

85

30.9

ST

Cortical suspensory fixation

Cortical suspensory fixation

–

33.2 (2 year), 31.4 (1 year)

–

Otsuka et al. [33]

20 (8/12)

Clinical trial

89

21.1

BPTB

Metal interference screws

Metal interference screws

–

–

–

Schurz et al. [35]

79 (52/27)

Prospective

85

29

ST

Cortical suspensory fixation

Cortical suspensory fixation

45.1 ± 13.29 (2 year), 44.9 ± 11.1 (1 year)

39.7 (2 year), 37.7 (1 year)

–

Shah et al. [36]

40 (36/4)

Prospective

74

27.1

ST

Cortical suspensory fixation

Cortical suspensory fixation

–

23.8 ± 19.42 (1 year)

All [normal] (1 year)

Lubowitz et al. [30]

27 (9/18)

Randomized controlled trial

80

41.6

Posterior TT

Tibial Retro Screw (Arthrex) (Aperture)

Bio-Composite femoral interference screw (Aperture)

33.2 ± 16.28 (2 year), 33.5 ± 17.44 (1 year)

–

–

31 (11/20)

Randomized controlled trial

80

40.2

Posterior TT

Titanium cortical button (Arthrex) (Suspensory)

Femoral fixed loop length Retro-Button (Arthrex) (Suspensory)

36.9 ± 21.83 (2 year), 33.2 ± 20.08 (1 year)

–

–

Volpi et al. [37]

20 (12/8)

Controlled trial

71

38.4 ± 10.8

ST

Metallic cortical suture button

Cortical femoral fixation

–

–

–

Dujardin et al. [29]

20 (12/8)

Prospective

61

28 ± 8.2

ST (anterior)

–

–

–

–

–

19 (10/6)

Prospective

61

24 ± 6.7

ST (posterior)

–

–

–

–

–

Buda et al. [34]

31 (31/0)

Prospective

74

27 ± 8.7

ST

–

–

36.4 ± 6.84 (1 year)

–

30 [normal]; 1 [mild instability] (1 year)

Monaco et al. [31]

22 (15/7)

Controlled trial, III

86

32.5 ± 6.7

ST

Flip-then-fill technique

Flip-then-fill technique

41 (2 year)

36 (2 year)

–

Bi et al. [26]

62 (34/28)

Randomized controlled trial

95

29.1 ± 6.5

AHPLT

Tightrope

Tightrope

36.7 ± 10.32 (2 year)

–

–

62 (31/31)

Randomized controlled trial

95

27.9 ± 6.7

ST

Tightrope

Tightrope

39.2 ± 9.23 (2 year)

–

–

Watanabe et al. [38]

24 (13/11)

Prospective, IV

79

31.0

ST

Endo Button

Endo Button CL BTB

–

39 ± 15.23 (2 year)

All [normal]

Blackman and Blackman [27]

95 (60/35)

Prospective

69

27.6

ST, GT

Suspensory button

Suspensory button

–

–

–

Bressy et al. [28]

35 (22/13)

Prospective

66

27 ± 7.8

ST

Suspensory button

Suspensory button

29.8 ± 26.83 (> 1 year)

35.3 ± 30.71

–

Nawabi et al. [32]

23 (15/8)

Prospective

66

12.6 ± 1.25

ST

Attachable button system (ABS) (Tightrope)

Tightrope (reverse tensioning button)

–

–

–

Benea et al. [66]

23 (16/7)

Prospective Randomized

74

28.4 ± 8.6

ST

Suture button

Tight rope

20.7 ± 20.58 (6 months)

–

–

Brandsson et al. [40]

29 (20/9)

Prospective Randomized

87

27

BPTB

Interference screw rear entry

Interference screw rear entry

–

20 ± 22.67

–

Kouloumentas et al. [67]

45 (28/17)

Prospective Randomized, I

87

27.6 ± 11.4

ST

Tight rope (suspensory fixation)

Tight rope (suspensory fixation)

41.7 ± 15.12 (2 year)

52.1 ± 15.84

–

Lubowitz et al. [68]

76 (38/37)

Prospective Randomized, 1

87

39.3 ± 12.1

TT

Bio-absorbable tibial interference screw

Bio-absorbable femoral interference screw (Arthrex, Naples, FL)

39.1 ± 18.96 (2 year)

–

–

Russu et al. [69]

32

Prospective Randomized

77

–

ST

–

–

19.76 ± 16.61 (6 months)

–

–

  1. CMS Coleman methodology score, ST semitendinosus, BPTB bone patellar tibial bone, TT tibial tendon, GT gracilis tendon, AHPLT anterior half of peroneus longus tendon