Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient characteristics of cohort

From: The association the patient-reported outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy with radiographic features: a short-term retrospective study

Radiographic parameters

No. (HHS)

P Value†

No. (iHOT12)

P Value†

Preserved (n = 40 hips)

Symptomatic (n = 26 hips)

Preserved (n = 46 hips)

Symptomatic (n = 20 hips)

Preoperative radiographic parameters

      

Acetabular coverage ratio < 75%

40 (100%)

23 (88%)

0.111

46 (100%)

17(85%)

0.025

Sharp angle > 40°

39 (98%)

25 (96%)

1.000

44 (96%)

20 (100%)

1.000

LCEA

  

0.108

  

0.128

 < 5°

15 (38%)

5 (19%)

 

16 (35%)

4 (20%)

 

5°–20°

21 (53%)

14 (54%)

 

25 (54%)

10 (50%)

 

 > 20°

4 (10%)

7 (27%)

 

5 (11%)

6 (30%)

 

Tönnis angle > 10°

39 (98%)

25 (96%)

1.000

45 (98%)

19 (95%)

0.517

Joint congruency poor or fair

11 (28%)

18 (69%)

0.001

13 (28%)

16 (80%)

0.000

Postoperative radiographic parameters

      

Acetabular coverage ratio > 75%

40 (100%)

26 (100%)

1.000

46 (100%)

20 (100%)

1.000

Sharp angle < 40°

36 (90%)

25 (96%)

0.655

42 (91%)

19 (95%)

0.988

LCEA

  

0.000

  

0.001

 < 20°

0

1 (4%)

 

1 (2%)

0

 

20°–38°

27 (68%)

5 (19%)

 

29 (63%)

3 (15%)

 

 > 38°

13 (33%)

20 (77%)

 

16 (35%)

17 (85%)

 

Tönnis angle

  

0.012

  

0.011

0°–10°

25 (63%)

13 (50%)

 

30 (65%)

8 (40%)

 

− 10°–0°

14 (35%)

6 (23%)

 

14 (30%)

6 (30%)

 

 < − 10°

1 (3%)

7 (27%)

 

2 (4%)

6 (30%)

 

Joint congruency poor or fair

7 (18%)

8 (31%)

0.209

9 (20%)

6 (30%)

0.542

  1. †Based on univariable comparisons between preserved and symptomatic hips