Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the current study with Hafez et al.

From: Anthropometric measurements of non-arthritic knees in an Egyptian population: an MRI-based study

 

(Morphometry of the proximal tibia)

(Morphometry of the distal femur)

Authors

Population

Method

Study knee No.

t-ML

t-AP

t-AR

f-ML

f-AP

f-AR

Hafez et al. [21]

Arabian

3D CT

124

(arthritic)

80.2 ± 4.6 (M)

72.9 ± 5.5 (F)

74.4 ± 6.0 (C)

52.5 ± 5.6 (M)

48.1 ± 3.9 (F)

48.9 ± 4.6 (C)

1.56 ± 0.1 (M)

1.52 ± 0.1 (F)

1.53 ± 0.1 (C)

78.5 ± 7.1 (M)

70.5 ± 5.5 (F)

72.1 ± 6.6 (C)

78.5 ± 4.7 (M)

67.3 ± 4.9 (F)

68.4 ± 6.9 (C)

1.43 ± 0.1 (M)

1.42 ± 0.1 (F)

1.43 ± 0.1 (C)

Our study

Egyptian

MRI

200

(non-arthritic)

76.1 ± 3.0 (M)

67.3 ± 3.2 (F)

71.6 ± 5.4 (C)

46.9 ± 3.0 (M)

41.4 ± 2.9 (F)

44.2 ± 4.0 (C)

1.62 ± 0.1 (M)

1.63 ± 0.1 (F)

1.63 ± 0.1 (C)

74.9 ± 3.2 (M)

67.3 ± 3.7 (F)

71.1 ± 5.1 (C)

61.0 ± 3.1 (M)

54.8 ± 3.3 (F)

57.9 ± 4.4 (C)

1.23 ± 0.01 (M)

1.23 ± 0.02 (F)

1.23 ± 0.04 (C)

P value

<  0.001*

<  0.001*

<  0.001*

<  0.001*

<  0.001*

<  0.001*

  1. M male, F female, C combined
  2. *One sample t test was used to compare the study mean vs the mean of other studies