Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of ROM, VAS, and FJS between two groups after TKA

From: A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty outcome for stiff knee with or without sequential antirheumatic drug treatment

  

ROM

 

VAS

FJS

Preoperative

Postoperative

at week 6

Postoperative

at month 6

Postoperative

at year 1

Postoperative

at year 2

Preoperative

Postoperative

at week 6

Postoperative

at month 6

Postoperative

at year 1

Postoperative

at year 2

Postoperative

at year 2

Group

           

  Drug treatmenta

10

(0–50)

90

(30–95)

85

(30–110)

80

(30–110)

80

(30–110)

6

(0–9)

3

(0–9)

0

(0–5)

0

(0–5)

0

(0–5)

50

(25–100)

  No drug

treatmenta

25

(0–50)

90

(60–90)

90

(60–90)

90

(60–90)

90

(70–90)

6

(3–9)

3

(0–6)

0

(0–4)

0

(0–4)

0

(0–4)

75

(25–75)

Statistic

p = 0.435

p = 0.658

p = 0.627

p = 0.332

p = 0.284

p = 0.335

p = 0.188

p = 0.065

p = 0.158

p = 0.351

p = 0.335

  1. ROM range of motion, VAS visual analogue scale, FJS “Forgotten Joint” Scale
  2. aThe values are given as the median, with the range in parentheses