Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of ROM, VAS, and FJS between two groups after TKA

From: A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty outcome for stiff knee with or without sequential antirheumatic drug treatment

   ROM   VAS FJS
Preoperative Postoperative
at week 6
Postoperative
at month 6
Postoperative
at year 1
Postoperative
at year 2
Preoperative Postoperative
at week 6
Postoperative
at month 6
Postoperative
at year 1
Postoperative
at year 2
Postoperative
at year 2
Group            
  Drug treatmenta 10
(0–50)
90
(30–95)
85
(30–110)
80
(30–110)
80
(30–110)
6
(0–9)
3
(0–9)
0
(0–5)
0
(0–5)
0
(0–5)
50
(25–100)
  No drug
treatmenta
25
(0–50)
90
(60–90)
90
(60–90)
90
(60–90)
90
(70–90)
6
(3–9)
3
(0–6)
0
(0–4)
0
(0–4)
0
(0–4)
75
(25–75)
Statistic p = 0.435 p = 0.658 p = 0.627 p = 0.332 p = 0.284 p = 0.335 p = 0.188 p = 0.065 p = 0.158 p = 0.351 p = 0.335
  1. ROM range of motion, VAS visual analogue scale, FJS “Forgotten Joint” Scale
  2. aThe values are given as the median, with the range in parentheses