Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

Year

Study design

Simple size

Mean age (years)

Gender (M/F)

Fracture type

Follow-up (months)

La

Cro

La

Cro

La

Cro

La

Cro

La

Cro

Ducic et al. [1]

2016

RCT

71

67

6.50 ± 1.85

6.70 ± 1.6

43/24

45/26

II/III

II/III

11.2 ± 2.3 (8.9–13.5)

11.2 ± 2.3 (8.9–13.5)

Prashant et al. [2]

2016

RCT

31

31

8.25

8.55

23/8

22/8

III

III

7.62 (32.64 weeks)

7.96 (34.12 weeks)

Shafi et al. [3]

2013

RCT

100

100

5.83 ± 1.83

6.25 ± 2.26

78/22

80/20

NA

NA

3

3

Maity et al. [4]

2012

RCT

80

80

6.12 ± 6.82

6.24 ± 1.77

64/16

48/32

II/III

II/III

36

36

Anwar et al. [5]

2011

RCT

25

25

7.02 ± 1.25

7.02 ± 1.25

NA

NA

II/III

II/III

6

6

Gaston et al. [6]

2010

RCT

47

57

5.70

6.20

22/25

31/26

III

III

NA

NA

Vaidya et al. [7]

2009

RCT

29

31

5.80

6.20

21/8

17/14

III

III

6.2

6.6

Tripuraneni et al. [8]

2009

RCT

20

20

4.30

5.50

NA

NA

II/III

II/III

2.17 (9.3 weeks)

1.82 (7.8 weeks)

Yen et al. [9]

2008

RCT

28

24

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Kocher et al. [10]

2007

RCT

28

24

6.10 ± 1.50

5.70 ± 1.60

10/18

13/11

III

III

3

3

Foead et al. [11]

2004

RCT

32

34

5.78

5.78

NA

NA

II/III

II/III

NA

NA

Karim et al. [12]

2016

RCT

20

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

  1. La lateral pinning entry, Cro crossover pinning entry, M male, F female, II Gartland type II fracture, III Gartland type III fracture