Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics of the subjects

From: Inter-rater variability of three-dimensional fracture reduction planning according to the educational background

Patient

Age (years)

Sex

Side

Total number of fragments

Number of fragments included in statistic

AO classification

1

31

m

R

4

3

2R3C

2

60

m

L

4

3

2R3C

3

46

f

L

7

6

2R3C

4

53

f

L

2

2

2R3C

5

34

f

R

3

3

2R3C

6

29

f

L

1

1

2R3A

7

20

f

R

3

2

2R3C

8

15

f

R

3

2

2R3C

9

48

f

L

3

2

2R3C

10

50

f

R

2

1

2R3A

11

28

m

L

2

2

2R3B

12

67

m

R

3

2

2R3C

13

45

m

R

2

2

2R3B

14

40

m

L

2

2

2R3B

15

23

f

R

1

1

2R3B

16

23

f

L

3

2

2R3C

17

55

m

L

7

4

2R3C

18

66

m

R

3

3

2R3C

19

51

m

R

3

3

2R3C

20

51

m

L

5

5

2R3C

Avg.

41.9

10× m

10× f

10× R 10× L

3.15

2.55

2× 2R3A

4× 2R3B

14× 2R3C

  1. m male, f female, R right, L left