Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between patterns of meniscal tears with Schatzker classification

From: Arthroscopically assisted evaluation of frequency and patterns of meniscal tears in operative tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective study

Patterns of meniscal tears

Schatzker I (n = 7)

Schatzker II (n = 99)

Schatzker III (n = 17)

Schatzker IV (n = 31)

Schatzker V (n = 66)

Schatzker VI (n = 32)

Frequency of meniscal tears

Statistics analysis

Longitudinal (%)

2 (28.6%)

43 (43.4%)a

3 (17.6%)

3 (9.7%)

5 (7.6%)

3 (9.4%)

59 (23.4%)d

P < 0.05

Radial (%)

0 (0%)

5 (5.1%)

2 (11.8%)

3 (9.7%)

6 (9.1%)

2 (9.5%)

19 (7.5%)

P > 0.05

Flap (%)

0 (0%)

6 (6.1%)

0 (0%)

4 (12.9%)

6 (9.1%)

1 (4.8%)

17 (6.7%)

P > 0.05

Bucket-handle (%)

0 (0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0%)

6 (19.4%)b

5 (7.6%)

5 (15.6%)

18 (7.1%)

P < 0.05

Horizontal (%)

1 (14.3%)

3 (3.0%)

1 (5.9%)

0 (0%)

7 (10.6%)

2 (6.3%)

13 (5.2%)

P > 0.05

Oblique (%)

0 (0%)

3 (3.0%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (3.2%)

6 (9.1%)

1 (3.1%)

12 (4.8%)

P > 0.05

Complex (%)

0 (0%)

9 (9.1%)

0 (0%)

1 (3.2%)

13 (19.7%)

7 (21.9%)c

30 (11.9%)

P < 0.05

  1. ap < 0.05, compared with Schatzker I, III, IV, V, VI
  2. bp < 0.05, compared with Schatzker I, II, III, V
  3. cp < 0.05, compared with Schatzker I, II, III, IV
  4. dp < 0.05, compared with other patterns of meniscal tears