Skip to main content

Table 2 The GRADE evidence quality for each outcome

From: Intra-articular magnesium to alleviate postoperative pain after arthroscopic knee surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Outcome

Number of Included Studies

Total Participants (Mg/ Control)

MD (95% CI)

Heterogeneity

Quality of Evidence (GRADE)

VAS at rest

at 2h

8

212/211

-0.74 (-0.84, -0.64)

I2 = 0%, P = 0.51

LOW

at 4h

6

152/151

-0.24 (-0.37, -0.11)

I2 = 45%, P = 0.11

MODERATE d

at 12h

6

152/152

-0.53 (-0.64, -0.41)

I2 = 47%, P = 0.10

HIGH

at 24h

7

186/186

-0.33 (-0.42, -0.24)

I2 = 30%, P = 0.20

HIGH

VAS with movement

at 2h

7

140/139

-0.46 (-0.64, -0.27)

I2 = 39%, P = 0.14

HIGH

at 4h

6

150/149

-0.85 (-1.40, -0.30)

I2 = 95%, P <0.00001

MODERATE b

at 12h

6

150/149

-0.83 (-1.17, -0.48)

I2 = 71%, P = 0.004

MODERATE c

at 24h

7

170/169

-0.58 (-0.79, -0.36)

I2 = 45%, P = 0.09

HIGH

Anesthetic Consumption

8

229/220

-4.23 (-4.64, -3.82)

I2 = 27%, P = 0.21

HIGH

Anesthetic duration

11

311/302

329.99 (228.73, 431.24)

I2 = 99%, P<0.00001

LOW b

  1. (1) GRADE working group grades of evidence:
  2. High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
  3. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
  4. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
  5. Very low quality: Any estimate of effect is very uncertain
  6. (2) Explanations:
  7. aStudy limitation: included trials are quasi design
  8. bInconsistency of results: large heterogeneity
  9. cIndirectness of evidence: large differences between the interventions in different trials
  10. dImprecision: small sample size and wide 95%CI
  11. eReporting bias: positive values showing benefits of the studied intervention