Skip to main content

Table 3 WMD and 95% confidence intervals of four treatment modalities of two endpoint outcomes

From: Effect of femoral posterior condyle offset on knee joint function after total knee replacement: a network meta-analysis and a sequential retrospective cohort study

WMD (95% CI)

Flexion contracture improvement

 A

− 0.54 (− 2.79, 1.58)

− 1.06 (− 3.41, 1.23)

− 0.79 (− 3.28, 1.54)

 0.54 (− 1.58, 2.79)

B

− 0.48 (− 2.25, 1.16)

− 0.21 (− 2.39, 1.78)

 1.06 (− 1.23, 3.41)

0.48 (− 1.16, 2.25)

C

0.33 (− 1.97, 2.43)

 0.79 (− 1.54, 3.28)

0.21 (− 1.78, 2.39)

− 0.33 (− 2.43, 1.97)

D

Knee flexion improvement

 A

− 5.84 (− 16.67, 3.72)

− 0.66 (− 13.21, 9.90)

− 2.97(− 11.85, 4.02)

 5.84 (− 3.72, 16.67)

B

5.28 (− 4.75, 14.38)

2.93 (− 6.41, 11.61)

 0.66 (− 9.90, 13.21)

− 5.28(− 14.38, 4.75)

C

− 2.44(− 12.88, 8.38)

 2.97 (− 4.02, 11.85)

− 2.93(− 11.61, 6.41)

2.44 (− 8.38, 12.88)

D

KS function score improvement

 A

0.12 (− 5.44, 5.91)

2.63 (− 3.11, 8.60)

1.12 (− 4.97, 7.41)

 − 0.12 (− 5.91, 5.44)

B

2.31 (− 1.69, 6.24)

0.77 (− 3.53, 5.88)

 − 2.63 (− 8.60, 3.11)

− 2.31 (− 6.24, 1.69)

C

− 1.74 (− 6.40, 4.02)

 − 1.12 (− 7.41, 4.97)

− 0.77 (− 5.88, 3.53)

1.74 (− 4.02, 6.40)

D

KS knee score improvement

 A

0.05 (− 9.67, 9.38)

2.90 (− 6.95, 12.74)

0.82 (− 9.21, 10.63)

 − 0.05 (− 9.38, 9.67)

B

2.85 (− 4.23, 10.00)

0.78 (− 6.74, 8.40)

 − 2.90 (− 12.74, 6.95)

− 2.85 (− 10.00, 4.23)

C

− 2.12 (− 10.72, 6.50)

 − 0.82 (− 10.63, 9.21)

− 0.78 (− 8.40, 6.74)

2.12 (− 6.50, 10.72)

D

  1. WMD weighted mean difference, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals, KS knee society. A, The change of PCO decrease of 2 mm or more. B, The change of PCO decrease by 0 mm to 2 mm. C, The change of PCO increase by 0 mm to 2 mm. D, The change of PCO increase by 2 mm or more