Skip to main content

Table 3 WMD and 95% confidence intervals of four treatment modalities of two endpoint outcomes

From: Effect of femoral posterior condyle offset on knee joint function after total knee replacement: a network meta-analysis and a sequential retrospective cohort study

WMD (95% CI)
Flexion contracture improvement
 A − 0.54 (− 2.79, 1.58) − 1.06 (− 3.41, 1.23) − 0.79 (− 3.28, 1.54)
 0.54 (− 1.58, 2.79) B − 0.48 (− 2.25, 1.16) − 0.21 (− 2.39, 1.78)
 1.06 (− 1.23, 3.41) 0.48 (− 1.16, 2.25) C 0.33 (− 1.97, 2.43)
 0.79 (− 1.54, 3.28) 0.21 (− 1.78, 2.39) − 0.33 (− 2.43, 1.97) D
Knee flexion improvement
 A − 5.84 (− 16.67, 3.72) − 0.66 (− 13.21, 9.90) − 2.97(− 11.85, 4.02)
 5.84 (− 3.72, 16.67) B 5.28 (− 4.75, 14.38) 2.93 (− 6.41, 11.61)
 0.66 (− 9.90, 13.21) − 5.28(− 14.38, 4.75) C − 2.44(− 12.88, 8.38)
 2.97 (− 4.02, 11.85) − 2.93(− 11.61, 6.41) 2.44 (− 8.38, 12.88) D
KS function score improvement
 A 0.12 (− 5.44, 5.91) 2.63 (− 3.11, 8.60) 1.12 (− 4.97, 7.41)
 − 0.12 (− 5.91, 5.44) B 2.31 (− 1.69, 6.24) 0.77 (− 3.53, 5.88)
 − 2.63 (− 8.60, 3.11) − 2.31 (− 6.24, 1.69) C − 1.74 (− 6.40, 4.02)
 − 1.12 (− 7.41, 4.97) − 0.77 (− 5.88, 3.53) 1.74 (− 4.02, 6.40) D
KS knee score improvement
 A 0.05 (− 9.67, 9.38) 2.90 (− 6.95, 12.74) 0.82 (− 9.21, 10.63)
 − 0.05 (− 9.38, 9.67) B 2.85 (− 4.23, 10.00) 0.78 (− 6.74, 8.40)
 − 2.90 (− 12.74, 6.95) − 2.85 (− 10.00, 4.23) C − 2.12 (− 10.72, 6.50)
 − 0.82 (− 10.63, 9.21) − 0.78 (− 8.40, 6.74) 2.12 (− 6.50, 10.72) D
  1. WMD weighted mean difference, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals, KS knee society. A, The change of PCO decrease of 2 mm or more. B, The change of PCO decrease by 0 mm to 2 mm. C, The change of PCO increase by 0 mm to 2 mm. D, The change of PCO increase by 2 mm or more
\