Table 1 Included articles characteristics
From: Treatment of femoral neck fractures: sliding hip screw or cannulated screws? A meta-analysis
Study/year | n (SHS/CS) | Mean age (SHS/CS) | Gender(M/F) (SHS/CS) | Intervention | Follow-up(month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linde 1986 | 40/47 | 76/76 | (16/24)/(14/33) | SHS vs Four CCS | - |
Madsen 1987 | 51/52 | 75/74 | (14/37)/(11/41) | SHS vs Four CCS | 24 |
Kuokkanen1991 | 17/16 | 60/72.5 | - | SHS vs Three CCS | 24 |
Sorensen 1992 | 35/38 | 75/76.14 | (10/25)/(8/30) | DHS vs Three GCS | 36 |
Watson 2012 | 30/28 | 77.9/76.7 | (6/25)/(5/24) | DHS vs Three CCS | 24 |
Siavashi 2015 | 30/28 | 30/28 | (25/5)/(21/7) | DHS vs Three CCS | 36 |
Gupta 2016 | 40/45 | 40.7/39.3 | (23/17)/(32/13) | SHS vs Three CCS | 48 |
FAITH 2017 | 542/537 | 72.2/72 | (212/323)/(210/325) | SHS vs Three CCS | 24 |
FAITH-2 2020 | 43/43 | 43/39.2 | (30/13)/(33/10) | SHS vs Three CCS | 12 |