Skip to main content

Table 3 Prognosis and complications of the patients at the final follow-up

From: As an unusual traumatic presentation, acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture: a retrospective case series of 18 patients

Case

Reduction qualityb

Bone healing time (weeks)

Harris score

VAS score

Heterotopic ossification (Brooker grade)

Posttraumatic arthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade)

Avascular necrosis of femoral head

Converted to THA

Time to THA

1

Excellent-good

12

92

0

-

0

No

No

-

2

Fair

12

85

1

-

1

No

No

-

3

Excellent-good

12

89

1

-

1

No

No

-

4

Excellent-good

24

91

0

-

0

No

No

-

5

Excellent-good

24

88

0

-

0

No

No

-

6

Excellent-good

12

96

0

3

0

No

No

-

7

Poor

24

79

4

-

3

No

No

-

8

Excellent-good

12

93

1

-

0

No

No

-

9

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10

Excellent-good

12

93

0

1

1

No

No

-

11a

Fair

12

55

5

-

1

Yes

Yes

2.2

12a

Excellent-good

12

67

6

1

2

Yes

Yes

1.8

13

Excellent-good

24

91

0

-

0

No

No

-

14

Excellent-good

12

84

1

-

2

No

No

-

15

Fair

12

96

0

1

0

No

No

-

16a

Excellent-good

12

66

5

3

1

Yes

Yes

2.5

17

Excellent-good

12

77

3

2

1

Yes

No

-

18

Excellent-good

12

88

2

-

1

No

No

-

  1. Note: The patient in case 9 died because of pulmonary infection after the operation
  2. VAS visual analogue scale, THA total hip arthroplasty
  3. aLast follow-up before total hip arthroplasty
  4. bMatta’s standard for acetabular fractures