From: A meta-analysis of measurement properties of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET)
Study | Content validity | Structural validity | Internal consistency | Cross-cultural validity | Reliability | Measurement error | Hypotheses testing for construct validity | Responsiveness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kirkley et al. [2] | Excellent | na | Poor | na | Fair | na | Fair | Fair |
Shivonen et al. [11] | Poor | na | Poor | Poor | Poor | na | Fair | Poor |
Celik et al. [12] | Poor | na | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | Good | na |
Tong et al. [13] | Poor | na | Poor | Poor | Good | na | Good | Poor |
van der Wal et al. [14] | Good | na | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | Good | Good |
Sgroi et al. [15] | Poor | na | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | Fair | na |