Skip to main content

Table 1 Generalities and demographic data of included studies

From: Better outcomes and reduced failures for arthroplasty over osteotomy for advanced compartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients older than 50 years

Author, year

Type of study

Follow-up (months)

Type of procedure

Number of knees

Female (%)

Mean age

Mean BMI

Type of implant

Jeon et al., 2017 [34]

RCS

24

OWHTO

26

84.60

56.8

26.6

TomoFix (DePuy Synthes)

CKA

21

80.90

60.7

26.1

High Flex (Zimmer)

Krych et al., 2017 [35]

RCS

84.00

OWHTO

30

28.30

48.0

31.9

Not specified

CKA

133

55.20

47.0

32.5

Miller-Galante (Zimmer)

Petersen et al., 2016 [36]

RCS

60

OWHTO

13

39.10

58.9

23.0

TomoFix (DePuy Synthes)

CKA

25

64.00

60.7

25.0

Oxford III implant

Ryu et al., 2018 [37]

RCS

36.55

OWHTO

23

91.30

57.6

27.7

ChronOS vivify spacer + TomoFix (DePuy Synthes)

CKA

22

86.50

60.5

25.4

Sigma unicompartmental knee (DePuy)

Stukenborg-Colsman et al., 2001 [38]

RCT

90

OWHTO

32

40.60

67.0

 

Five-hole-two-thirds tubular plate and a cortical screw

CKA

30

78.60

67.0

 

Unicondylar knee sliding (Aesculap)

Takeuchi et al., 2010 [39]

RCS

72.5

OWHTO

27

75.00

67.0

 

TomoFix (DePuy Synthes)

CKA

30

47.10

77.0

 

Uni-Knee (Nakashima Propeller Co)

Yim et al., 2013 [40]

RCS

43.8

OWHTO

58

96.00

58.3

 

2 wedge plates (Aesculap)

CKA

50

87.90

60.3

 

Miller-Galante (Zimmer)

  1. RCS retrospective clinical study, RCT randomized clinical trial