Skip to main content

Table 3 Data on time to union, complications, and residual angulation at the fracture site from the included studies

From: Pin vs plate fixation for metacarpal fractures: a meta-analysis

Studies

Time to union

Complications with the number of patients

Residual angulation at the fracture site (degrees)

Pin group

Plate group

Pin group

Plate group

Pin group

Plate group

Cha et al. [15]

NR

NR

Superficial infection, 1

Extensor lag, 4

0.8 ± 1

0.6 ± 0.1

Dreyfuss et al. [16]

50 (28–286)a days

59 (37–105)a days

Work-related fracture, 1

Nil

AP, 1 (0–11)

Lateral, 1 (0–9)

AP, 0 Lateral, 0

Vasilakis et al. [17]

NR

NR

Stiffness requiring extensor tenolysis, 1

Non-union, 1

Hardware removal, extensor tenolysis, 1

NR

NR

Pandey et al. [18]

3 months

3 months

Infection. 1

Malunion, 1

Transient numbness, 1

Transient numbness, 4

Prominent implant and impingement at terminal motion, 4

NR

NR

Fujitani et al. [19]

NR

NR

Transient neuritis of the dorsal ulnar nerve, 1

Extensor tendon rupture, 1

Transient neuritis of dorsal ulnar nerve, 1

Palmar tilt, 16 (NR)

Lateral tilt, 16 (NR)

Palmar tilt, 10 (NR)

Lateral tilt, 10 (NR)

Ozer et al. [20]

5.4 (4–8) weeks

5.2 (4–7) weeks

Loss of reduction, 5

Hardware removal, 15

Hardware removal, 2

AP, 2(0–10)

Lateral, 8 (0–25)

AP, 0

Lateral, 0

Facca et al. [21]

NR

NR

Wire migration. 3

Neurological lesions. 3

Aesthetic blemish due to callus. 1

Hardware removal. 3

Delayed consolidation. 2

Instability of site. 1

NR

NR

Gupta et al. [22]

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Takigami et al. [23]

1.6 ± 0.6a months

2.6 ± 1.6a months

Superficial infection, 1

Soreness of pin site, 4

Screw breakage, 3

Screw loosening, 2

NR

NR

  1. Data on time to union and residual angulation at fracture site presented as mean (range) or mean ± standard deviation
  2. AP anteroposterior, NR not reported
  3. sStatistical significant difference reported between the two groups