Table 1 Comparison of bone defect and position of acetabular prosthesis before and after periacetabular osteotomy
From: Is cup positioning easier in DDH patients previously treated with Bernese periacetabular osteotomy?
A-ASA (°) | P-ASA (°) | S-ASA (°) | I-ASA (°) | MWT, mm | VDRC, mm | HDRC, mm | Cover rate, % | Size, mm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-PAO | 71.72 ± 4.22 | 100.85 ± 3.56 | 113.17 ± 8.89 | 18.75 ± 3.34 | 8.39 ± 2.60 | 24.04 ± 3.48 | 82.91 ± 4.78 | 84.39 ± 6.13 | 48 |
Post-PAO | 54.47 ± 13.08 | 102.61 ± 2.35 | 139.28 ± 1.95 | 8.24 ± 6.46 | 7.39 ± 2.84 | 28.52 ± 4.70 | 79.74 ± 6.35 | 84.95 ± 5.13 | 50 |
p value | 0.000 | 0.054 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.220 | 0.001 | 0.062 | 0.736 | 0.001 |