Skip to main content

Table 3 Mixed effects models for physical performance and self-reported measures (intention to treat analysis)

From: Home-based motor imagery intervention improves functional performance following total knee arthroplasty in the short term: a randomized controlled trial

Variable

     

LMEM time effect

 

Timeagroup effect

 
   

PRE (N = 17)

POST (N = 13)

Δ (%)

Parameter estimate (SE)

t value

(p value)

Parameter estimate (SE)

t value

(p value)

MViC extension (Nm/kg)

Operated leg

MIp

1.35 ± 0.41

0.80 ± 0.34

− 42.3

62.5

0.98 (0.08)

11.801 (< 0.001)

− 0.42 (0.12)

− 3.541 (0.001)

CON

1.55 ± 0.35

0.55 ± 0.25

− 62.5

Non-operated leg

MIp

1.80 ± 0.39

1.77 ± 0.29

1.2

− 0.008 (0.042)

− 0.205 (0.839)

0.008 (0.060)

0.129 (0.899)

CON

1.74 ± 0.44

1.66 ± 0.35

2.2

Voluntary muscle activation (%)

Operated leg

MIp

81.63 ± 12.48

84.84 ± 9.75

8.3

17.91 (5.10)

3.513 (0.001)

− 21.26 (7.21)

− 2.949 (0.006)

CON

82.42 ± 12.91

64.36 ± 20.85

− 16.7

Non-operated leg

MIp

85.26 ± 9.23

81.42 ± 12.44

− 3.2

− 0.22 (3.98)

− 0.056 (0.956)

4.05 (5.63)

0.720 (0.477)

CON

83.84 ± 8.78

84.08 ± 12.78

2.5

Knee flexion (degrees)

Operated leg

MIp

91.41 ± 12.81

82.31 ± 9.75

− 5.6

14.38 (4.50)

3.197 (0.03)

− 5.79 (6.36)

− 0.910 (0.370)

CON

86.76 ± 17.81

72.31 ± 14.28

− 13.2

Non-operated leg

MIp

106.88 ± 9.64

106.54 ± 9.93

2.4

− 2.51 (2.91)

− 0.862 (0.396)

1.71 (4.12)

0.416 (0.681)

CON

103.29 ± 12.16

106.77 ± 11.10

2.1

Knee extension (degrees)

Operated leg

MIp

4.12 ± 3.18

7.15 ± 3.74

45.9

− 3.20 (1.32)

− 2.42 (0.022)

0.15 (1.87)

0.081 (0.936)

CON

3.18 ± 2.51

6.38 ± 4.56

101.3

Non-operated leg

MIp

2.76 ± 1.79

2.15 ± 1.86

0.6

− 0.21 (0.75)

− 0.28 (0.784)

0.88 (1.07)

0.823 (0.417)

CON

1.65 ± 1.66

1.92 ± 2.36

8.3

VAS score (points)

Operated leg

MIp

53.55 ± 12.84

31.54 ± 12.14

− 39.8

16.93 (4.32)

3.92 (0.001)

5.13 (6.11)

0.840 (0.408)

CON

54.12 ± 15.93

37.31 ± 14.67

− 27.3

Non-operated leg

MIp

8.24 ± 8.83

1.54 ± 3.76

− 83.3

6.94 (2.26)

3.070 (0.004)

− 0.12 (3.20)

− 0.039 (0.970)

CON

13.82 ± 12.19

7.31 ± 13.01

− 56.0

Hand grip strength, dominant arm (kg)

 

MIp

36.53 ± 12.92

38.85 ± 7.41

− 0.8

0.45 (1.15)

0.391 (0.699)

− 0.13 (1.63)

− 0.079 (0.937)

CON

40.24 ± 12.42

36.77 ± 11.41

2.7

TUG (s)

 

MIp

7.72 ± 1.61

7.55 ± 1.22

4.0

− 4.02 (0.58)a

− 6.960 (< 0.001)

4.04 (0.82)

4.952 (< 0.001)

CON

7.45 ± 1.51

11.54 ± 3.01

54.4

OKS score (points)

 

MIp

23.12 ± 5.99

27.08 ± 5.17

28.3

− 3.22 (1.82)a

− 1.767 (0.087)

5.27 (2.49)

2.116 (0.043)

CON

23.0 ± 7.44

20.08 ± 4.27

− 5.2

  1. BMI Body mass index, MBI Magnitude-based inference, RDC Raw mean difference in change, Δ (%)–percent changes between initial and final measurement, SE Standard error, LMEM Linear mixed effects models p level of significance
  2. aNegative direction of effect means better result on test;
  3. Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD; Bold values represent a significant effect