Skip to main content

Table 2 Main characteristics of RCTs included in meta-analysis

From: Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

Sample Size, n

THA/HA, n

Surgical approach

Mean Age, y (SD or range)

Gender (M/F), n

BMI, kg/m2 (SD or range)

Preoperative hip pathology

SG

pl, p, l, c

OA

Fx

ANFH

Pts

Hips

CG

SG

CG

SG

CG

SG

CG

SG

CG

SG

CG

SG

CG

Meng et al. [41]

4

8

THA

4

4 pl

51.00 ± 4.54

4/0

21.49 (19.60–23.04)

0

0

8

Ouyang et al. [43]

24

24

THA

12

12 pl

54 (45–71)

55 (47–67)

8/4

9/3

23.1 ± 17.5–26.7

23.9 (16.9–30.4)

5

0

0

0

0

6

Yuan et al. [44]

84

84

THA

40

44 pl

74.3 (67–79)

75.7 (69–82)

24/16

21/23

22.73 ± 1.71

22.36 ± 1.89

5

6

21

24

10

12

Xie et al. [42]

92

92

THA

46

46 p

66.6 ± 11.88

64.47 ± 12.09

12/34

19/27

23.62 ± 1.63

24.06 ± 2.72

N/A

Huang et al. [45]

38

38

THA/HA

18

20pl

76.6 ± 71–85

77.5 (70–80)

7/11

6/14

< 30

< 30

0

18

20

0

Xu et al. [46]

92

92

HA

46

46 c

70.81 ± 6.0

71.02 ± 5.96

25/21

28/18

N/A

N/A

0

46

46

0

Zhang et al. [47]

54

54

THA

27

27 pl

62.41 ± 6.44

61.28 ± 6.7

10/17

12/15

24.53 ± 5.31

23.93 ± 4.89

7

9

N/A

15

14

Wu et al. [48]

40

40

HA

20

20 pl

80.5 (75–89)

12/28

N/A

N/A

0

40

0

Hou et al. [49]

40

40

THA

20

20 c

54.3 ± 13.7

53.8 ± 12.9

13/7

12/8

24.5 ± 3.6

23.9 ± 4.1

6

5

0

14

15

Xia et al. [50]

62

62

HA

30

32 pl

81 ± 4.57

80.66 ± 4.26

8/22

11/21

N/A

N/A

0

30

32

0

Yan et al. [51]

154

173

THA

70

103 l

66 (59–75)

65 (56–82)

29/35

42/48

24.5 (17.3–31.1)

23.6 (18–32.3)

N/A

11

23

39

55

Ren et al. [52]

42

42

THA

21

21 c

57.96 ± 6.89

58.45 ± 6.25

12/9

13/8

N/A

N/A

0

0

21

21

  1. SG SuperPATH approach group, CG conventional approach group, THA total hip arthroplasty, HA hemiarthroplasty, pl posterolateral approach, p posterior approach, l lateral approach, c conventional approach, OA osteoarthritis, Fx fracture, ANFH avascular necrosis of the femoral head, Pts patients