Skip to main content

Table 2 Review and compare the literature of Paprosky III acetabular defects revision using double-cup technique

From: Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects

Authors Number of patients Male/female Age (years) Paprosky classification Follow-up mHHS of the last follow-up Survivorship of the last follow-up Complications
Webb et al. [7] 20 9/11 67 Type 3a (55%); type 3b (45%) 28.8 months 68.7 No failure Complication incidence (40%), dislocation (30%), delayed wound healing (15%)
Loppini et al. [12] 16 5/11 68 Type 3a (44%); type 3b (56%) 34 months 77.2 No failure Complication incidence (18.8%), deep venous thrombosis (6.3%)
Our current series 18 8/10 68.3 Type 3a (61.1%); type 3b (38.9%) 61.0 months 73.7 No failure Complication incidence (33.3%), dislocation (16.7%), delay wound healing (16.7%)
  1. mHHS modified Harris Hip Score