Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the parameters between the HDDS and LDDS groups

From: Cervical sagittal alignment in adolescent high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis: how does the cervical spine respond to the reduction of spondylolisthesis?

 

HDDS group (n = 24)

LDDS group (n = 9)

P value

Sex

Male

3(12.5%)

8(89%)

< 0.001* (Fisher’s exact test)

female

21(87.5%)

1(11%)

Age (year)

13.0 ± 2.2

15.6 ± 1.9

0.005*

Slip percentage (%)

63.7 ± 25.5

26.0 ± 10.5

< 0.001*

Dub-LSA (°)

61.4 ± 16.0

109.4 ± 9.9

< 0.001*

PI (°)

72.0 ± 12.1

57.3 ± 12.2

0.004*

PT (°)

39.8 ± 9.9

14.8 ± 5.7

< 0.001*

SS (°)

32.2 ± 14.6

43.1 ± 8.5

0.044

Pelvic orientation

Unbalanced pelvis

22(92%)

1(11%)

< 0.001* (Fisher’s exact test)

Balanced pelvis

2(8%)

8(89%)

LL (°)

57.7 ± 24.1

56.0 ± 11.5

0.787

TK (°)

5.4 ± 21.3

32.1 ± 9.6

< 0.001*

CL (°)

− 8.5 ± 16.1

10.5 ± 11.8

0.003*

Patients with cervical kyphosis

17(70.8%)

2(22.2%)

0.019* (Fisher’s exact test)

SVA (mm)

56.5 ± 35.1

36.2 ± 38.9

0.161

Patients with sagittal imbalance (SVA> 5 cm)

10(41.6%)

1(11.1%)

0.205

  1. *Statistically significant P < 0.05